The argument presented here is written by a group of Linford College Alumni to the chair of the Arts department; they state that the college should require all art students to complete an internship with a company called Skyway Designs before graduation. They propound that this company is the best in the area and that according to a survey, students who complete an internship while in college will have better chances of finding a job after graduation. The authors have good intentions which are to increase the success of graduates in finding jobs, but their argument is extremely flawed. The conclusion reached by the authors is not reasonable or reliable due to the use of questionable assumptions, vaguely defined terms and a lack of evidence to support each claim made in their arguemnt.
To begin, the group of Alumni who wrote this letter did not give information as to who they are. This information is important to know, because they are making many claims that require professional art knowledge to back it up. If the authors are all computer technology graduates, how are they supposed to know which art internships will be best for the students? additionally another question that the arguers need to answer, is what is their intention with recommending this company? Do these alumni work for Skyway Designs, and therefore want students to intern there to decrease the amount of paid staff they have? If the authors answer these questions and define who they are and what their intentions are in recommending this company, their argument will appear more sound and reliable than it currently does.
In addition to defining who the authors are, the argument needs to include more information regarding the surveys thar are used. In the first line fo the argument the authors state that there was a recent survey completed of college graduates and then states that 90% agreed that internships helped them get jobs. In order for the argument to be strong, the authors need to answer these questions: how many students were interviewed, from which schools were they from as they could be national and international, what kind of questions were asked on the survey and was the sample representative? Without such answers, the survey cannot be used successfully as proof in their argument. Additionally, when the authors state that only 40% of the graduating arts students did an internship they should state how they got that percentage. For example what if they only asked 5 out of 200 students? If so, that would again not be a valid statement to make in the argument. If the authors completed a suvey that was representative of students in the college's city and had a large enough sample size, their argument would be stronger.
In addition to the use of vague terms and invalid surveys, the authors propound that Skyway Designs offers internships in all of their departments and therefore " every student is sure to find work there. " In order for this claim to be reliable, the authors need to address which departments are present in the company. For example, what if a student is a sculpting major or video game arts design? How is the reader supposed to know that every student will find an internship if there is no explanation of the departments in the company. If the authors provide this list then they can successfully state that " every student" can find an internship, although in reality, this is not very possible as there are most likely more graduate specialties than this company has in departments.
Finally, the authors contend that Skyway Designs is one of the best design businesses in the area because " over 80% in Linford city have used their services. " In order for this statement to be a valid argument, the authors need to answer an array of questions including: are there other design agencies in the area? What are the prices of this business compared to those in the area? For example, what if businesses are only using Skyway Designs because they are the cheapest option or because they are the only option?
In conclusion, the authors are recommending that the Arts department makes it mandatory for students to do an internship at Skyway Designs in an attempt to help students find jobs easier after graduation. Their argument is not valid due to the use of vague terms, questionable assumptions and a profound lack of evidence. In order to have a reliable argument, the authors should conduct surveys that are representative in size and population, define terms that are vague and provide the reader with more reliable evidence about the company and the city's use of the company. Answering such questions will provide the reader with a reliable argument.
The
argument
presented here
is written
by a group of
Linford
College Alumni to the chair of the
Arts
department
; they
state
that the college should require all
art
students
to complete an internship with a
company
called
Skyway
Designs
before
graduation. They propound that this
company
is the best in the
area
and that according to a
survey
,
students
who
complete an internship while in college will have better chances of finding a
job
after graduation. The
authors
have
good
intentions which are to increase the success of
graduates
in finding
jobs
,
but
their
argument
is
extremely
flawed. The conclusion reached by the
authors
is not reasonable or
reliable
due to the
use
of questionable assumptions,
vaguely
defined terms and a lack of evidence to support each claim made in their
arguemnt
.
To
begin
, the group of Alumni
who
wrote this letter did not give information as to
who
they are. This information is
important
to know,
because
they are making
many
claims that require professional
art
knowledge to back it up. If the
authors
are all computer technology
graduates
, how are they supposed to know which
art
internships will be best for the
students
?
additionally
another
question
that the arguers
need
to
answer
, is what is their intention with recommending this
company
? Do these alumni work for
Skyway
Designs
, and
therefore
want
students
to intern there to decrease the amount of paid staff they have? If the
authors
answer
these
questions
and define
who
they are and what their intentions are in recommending this
company
, their
argument
will appear more sound and
reliable
than it
currently
does.
In addition
to defining
who
the
authors
are, the
argument
needs
to include more information regarding the
surveys
thar
are
used
. In the
first
line
fo
the
argument
the
authors
state
that there was a recent
survey
completed of college
graduates
and then
states
that 90%
agreed
that internships
helped
them
get
jobs
.
In
order
for the
argument
to be strong, the
authors
need
to
answer
these
questions
: how
many
students
were interviewed
, from which schools were they from as they could be national and international, what kind of
questions
were asked
on the
survey
and was the sample representative? Without such
answers
, the
survey
cannot be
used
successfully
as proof in their
argument
.
Additionally
, when the
authors
state
that
only
40% of the graduating
arts
students
did an internship they should
state
how they
got
that percentage.
For example
what if they
only
asked 5 out of 200
students
? If
so
, that would again not be a valid statement to
make
in the
argument
. If the
authors
completed a
suvey
that was representative of
students
in the college's city and had a large
enough
sample size, their
argument
would be stronger.
In addition
to the
use
of vague terms and invalid
surveys
, the
authors
propound that
Skyway
Designs
offers internships in all of their
departments
and
therefore
"
; every
student
is sure to
find
work there.
"
; In
order
for this claim to be
reliable
, the
authors
need
to address which
departments
are present in the
company
.
For example
, what if a
student
is a sculpting major or video game
arts
design
? How is the reader supposed to know that every
student
will
find
an internship if there is no explanation of the
departments
in the
company
. If the
authors
provide this list then they can
successfully
state
that
"
; every
student"
; can
find
an internship, although in reality, this is not
very
possible as there are most likely more
graduate
specialties than this
company
has in departments.
Finally
, the
authors
contend that
Skyway
Designs
is one of the best
design
businesses in the
area
because
"
; over 80% in
Linford
city have
used
their services.
"
; In
order
for this statement to be a valid
argument
, the
authors
need
to
answer
an array of
questions
including: are there other
design
agencies in the
area
? What are the prices of this business compared to those in the
area
?
For example
, what if businesses are
only
using
Skyway
Designs
because
they are the cheapest option or
because
they are the
only
option?
In conclusion
, the
authors
are recommending that the
Arts
department
makes
it mandatory for
students
to do an internship at
Skyway
Designs
in an attempt to
help
students
find
jobs
easier after graduation. Their
argument
is not valid due to the
use
of vague terms, questionable assumptions and a profound lack of evidence. In
order
to have a
reliable
argument
, the
authors
should conduct
surveys
that are
representative in size
and population, define terms that are vague and provide the reader with more
reliable
evidence about the
company
and the city's
use
of the
company
. Answering such
questions
will provide the reader with a
reliable
argument
.