The writer of the argument recommends the prohibition of skateboarding in Central Plaza, and claims that if so, business in Central Plaza will return to its previously high levels. To support this claim the author cites anecdotal evidence regarding the increase in the popularity of skateboarding in Central Plaza with concomitant steady decrease in the number of shoppers there. The author also cites a dramatic increase in the amount of litter and vandalism throughout the plaza. Close scrutiny of these evidences reveals that they lend little credible support for the author’s recommendation.
Firstly, the author’s recommendation is based on a crucial assumption that the increase in the popularity of skateboarding is by itself responsible for the decline in business in Central Plaza. However, the question is that are there any other plausible factors affecting the business in Central Plaza? We need to know whether any other factors involving the business in Central Plaza were present in the last two years or not. Perhaps the decrease in business is due to global economic recession. Or Perhaps the quality of products or services offered by Central Plaza store owners has declined in the last two years. Without ruling out these and other possible scenarios, the writer of the argument cannot defend the recommendation.
To further support the recommendation, the editorial’s author assumes that the increase in the number of skateboard players in Central Plaza is responsible for the increase in litter and vandalism in Central Plaza. Nonetheless, the author does not offer any evidence that this is the case. We need to know whether the increase is directly related to the skateboard players or not. For instance, maybe in the last two years, the police performance in Central Plaza decreased significantly, or the customers and store owners were less careful in taking care of the Central Plaza’s properties. Until the author account for the foregoing possible explanations, I cannot accept the recommended course of action.
Even assuming that the increase in the popularity of skateboarding is responsible for increase in the litter and vandalism, there is still another problem with the argument in that, the author assumes that the increase in the litter and vandalism caused the decrease in business in Central Plaza. Nevertheless, the author fails to offer any substantiating evidence that this is the case. We need to know that this increase in the litter and vandalism by itself led to decrease in business in Central Plaza. Accordingly, the author cannot draw any firm conclusion about the effect of litter and vandalism on business in Central Plaza, let alone to recommend the prohibition of skateboarding in Central Plaza.
In sum, the argument is flawed and therefore unconvincing. To persuade me, the author must answer to some vital questions regarding the effect of skateboarding not only on business in Central Plaza, but also on litter and vandalism. We would also need to know whether the increase in litter and vandalism was responsible for the sharp decline in business in Central Plaza in the last two years.
The writer of the
argument
recommends the prohibition of skateboarding in
Central
Plaza
, and claims that if
so
,
business
in
Central
Plaza
will return to its previously high levels. To support this claim the
author
cites anecdotal
evidence
regarding the
increase
in the popularity of skateboarding in
Central
Plaza
with concomitant steady
decrease
in the number of shoppers there. The
author
also
cites a dramatic
increase
in the amount of
litter
and
vandalism
throughout the
plaza
.
Close scrutiny
of these
evidences
reveals that they lend
little
credible support for the
author’s
recommendation.
Firstly
, the
author’s
recommendation
is based
on a crucial assumption that the
increase
in the popularity of skateboarding is by itself
responsible
for the decline in
business
in
Central
Plaza
.
However
, the question is that are there any other plausible factors affecting the
business
in
Central
Plaza
? We
need
to
know
whether any other factors involving the
business
in
Central
Plaza
were present in the last two years or not. Perhaps the
decrease
in
business
is due to global economic recession. Or Perhaps the quality of products or services offered by
Central
Plaza
store owners has declined in the last two years. Without ruling out these and other possible scenarios, the writer of the
argument
cannot defend the recommendation.
To
further
support the recommendation, the editorial’s
author
assumes that the
increase
in the number of skateboard players in
Central
Plaza
is
responsible
for the
increase
in
litter
and
vandalism
in
Central
Plaza
. Nonetheless, the
author
does not offer any
evidence
that this is the case. We
need
to
know
whether the
increase
is
directly
related to the skateboard players or not.
For instance
, maybe in the last two years, the police performance in
Central
Plaza
decreased
significantly
, or the customers and store owners were less careful in taking care of the
Central
Plaza’s
properties. Until the
author
account for the foregoing possible explanations, I cannot accept the recommended course of action.
Even assuming that the
increase
in the popularity of skateboarding is
responsible
for
increase
in the
litter
and
vandalism
, there is
still
another problem with the
argument
in that, the
author
assumes that the
increase
in the
litter
and
vandalism
caused the
decrease
in
business
in
Central
Plaza
.
Nevertheless
, the
author
fails to offer any substantiating
evidence
that this is the case. We
need
to
know
that this
increase
in the
litter
and
vandalism
by itself led to
decrease
in
business
in
Central
Plaza
.
Accordingly
, the
author
cannot draw any firm conclusion about the effect of
litter
and
vandalism
on
business
in
Central
Plaza
,
let
alone to recommend the prohibition of skateboarding in
Central
Plaza.
In sum, the
argument
is flawed
and
therefore
unconvincing. To persuade me, the
author
must
answer to
some
vital questions regarding the effect of skateboarding not
only
on
business
in
Central
Plaza
,
but
also
on
litter
and
vandalism
. We would
also
need
to
know
whether the
increase
in
litter
and
vandalism
was
responsible
for the sharp decline in
business
in
Central
Plaza
in the last two years.