Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Do you think Animals deserve the same rights as Humans? Why or why not?

Do you think Animals deserve the same rights as Humans? Why or why not? EL2nq
The idea that animals could be considered legal persons with rights is relatively new. However, in centuries past animals were quite frequently involved in court cases in which they were put on trial. If they were found guilty for an offence the supposedly committed, such as murder and assault, punishments would be meted out, with some even being hanged for their crimes. This shows how humans have long thought of animals having at least some moral comprehension. However, opponents of the concept of animal rights argue that animals have neither a sense of morality nor an understanding of their duties towards others, and hence shouldn’t have rights. I believe that this is not the case though, as many experiments and studies conducted have time and again proven that animals are sentient creatures with emotions, thought, and the ability to regret, all things that are thought of as being “human-only. ” In one experiment a chimp called Nim was brought up with a New York family. The family, supporters of animal rights, raised Nim in the hopes of proving that the chimp in their midst would be capable of grammatically structured sign language. The experiment also focused on Nim's sense of morality. New Yorker Jenny Lee was 13 years old when Nim, then an infant chimp, was introduced to her family and became her "brother". She believes that even if Nim could not be persuaded to stop biting people, he did display some behaviours that seemed quite human. "He quickly understood how to say sorry and when sorry was appropriate, " Ms Lee told Newshour Extra. "He would very delicately kiss the tears off my cheek. " This perfectly encapsulates how animals To conclude this paper then, after reviewing the reasons for being opposed to assigning rights to non-human animals I am still faithfully for the idea. There is no justification for the barbaric and insensitive ways to which we have been treating the non-human animals over the decades. As I stated before, they are living creatures just as we are, they have families, emotions and struggles of their own without the ones we inflict on them. So then where does this leave us? Of course it is a complicated matter, but nonetheless non-human animals should be protected with rights against them being used as machines, for food, for their skins, their wool, and all cases in which they are being abused.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
could
be considered
legal persons with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
is
relatively
new.
However
, in centuries past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
were quite
frequently
involved in court cases in which they
were put
on trial. If they
were found
The usual collocation for "guilty" is "of" not "for". Did you mean "guilty of"?
guilty for
an
Possible spelling mistake. 'offence' is British English.
offence
the
supposedly
committed, such as murder and assault, punishments would
be meted
out, with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
even
being hanged
for their crimes. This
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
how humans have long
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
having at least
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
moral comprehension.
However
, opponents of the concept of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
argue that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
have neither a sense of morality nor an understanding of their duties towards others, and
hence
shouldn’t have rights.

I believe that this is not the case though, as
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
experiments and studies conducted have time and again proven that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are sentient creatures with emotions,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
, and the ability to regret, all things that are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
of as being “human-
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
. ”

In one experiment a chimp called
Possible spelling mistake found.
Nim
was brought
up with a New York
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
, supporters of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
, raised
Possible spelling mistake found.
Nim
in the hopes of proving that the chimp in their midst would be capable of
grammatically
structured
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sign
language. The experiment
also
focused on
Possible spelling mistake found.
Nim
's sense of morality. New Yorker Jenny Lee was 13 years
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
old
when
Possible spelling mistake found.
Nim
, then an infant chimp,
was introduced
to her
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
and became her
Use a smart opening quote here: "“".
"
brother
Use a smart closing quote here: "”".
"
. She believes that even if
Possible spelling mistake found.
Nim
could not
be persuaded
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
biting
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
, he did display
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
Possible spelling mistake. 'behaviours' is British English.
behaviours
that seemed quite human.
Use a smart opening quote here: "“".
"
He
quickly
understood how to say sorry and when sorry was appropriate,
Don't put a space on both sides of a quote symbol
"
Ms Lee
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
told
Possible spelling mistake found.
Newshour
Extra.
Use a smart opening quote here: "“".
"
He would
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
delicately
kiss the tears off my cheek.
Use a smart opening quote here: "“".
"
This
perfectly
encapsulates how
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
animals


To conclude
this paper then, after reviewing the reasons for
being opposed
to assigning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
to non-human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
I am
still
faithfully
for the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
. There is no justification for the barbaric and insensitive ways to which we have been treating the non-human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
over the decades. As I stated
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
, they are living creatures
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
as we are, they have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
families
, emotions and struggles of their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
without the ones we inflict on them.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
then where does this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
leave
us? Of
The comma is probably missing here: "course, it".
course it
is a complicated matter,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
nonetheless non-human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should
be protected
with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
against them being
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
as machines, for food, for their skins, their wool, and all cases in which they are
being abused
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS letter Do you think Animals deserve the same rights as Humans? Why or why not?

Letter
  American English
3 paragraphs
401 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts