Zoos are well known to display heterogeneous collection of animals to people and education them on wild animals. It is one major source to view animals that we don’t get to see everywhere in our daily life. But to what extent Zoos are necessary is disputable. The following essay analyses the various pros and cons of zoos.
Firstly, Wild animals are trapped from their natural habitat and are kept in cages and tiny artificial habitat that is created in the zoo. We see many cases where these wild animals are not taken proper care. They have little space to move around and don’t open live in groups. They are also trapped for years in the zoo. This does not help to preserve the wild animals but willinstead exaggerate the wild life.
On the other hand, many animals that lived hundreds of years ago are not seen any more. Our younger generations might not get to even see the various wild animals that currently exist. One such example is mammoth. These animals lived in the cold climatic conditions and disappeared gradually with the changing weather conditions. Many animals in wild die due to starvation. This can also be avoided in zoos. Additionally, some wild animals like deer have so protection from other wild animals. Animals like lions, tigers kill other animals that live in the forest for their survival. This also can be avoided in zoos.
Alternatively, to preserve animals like tigers that are reducing in number, there are various foundations in different countries. One such organization is black jaguar white tiger. It is different from zoo, here the animals are taken proper care and are also provided with the habitat that they would live in.
In conclusion, zoos are helpful to preserve animals and protect them from various conditions they face in wild but also its necessary to provide proper habitat for them to live.
Zoos are well known to display heterogeneous collection of
animals
to
people
and education them on wild
animals
. It is one major source to view
animals
that we don’t
get
to
see
everywhere in our daily life.
But
to what extent Zoos are necessary is disputable. The following essay analyses the
various
pros and cons of zoos.
Firstly
, Wild
animals
are trapped
from their natural
habitat
and are
kept
in cages and tiny artificial
habitat
that
is created
in the zoo. We
see
many
cases where these wild
animals
are not taken proper care. They have
little
space to
move
around and don’t open
live
in groups. They are
also
trapped for years in the zoo. This does not
help
to preserve the wild
animals
but
willinstead
exaggerate the wild life.
On the other hand
,
many
animals
that
lived
hundreds of years ago are not
seen
any more
. Our younger generations might not
get
to even
see
the
various
wild
animals
that
currently
exist. One such example is mammoth. These
animals
lived
in the
cold
climatic conditions and disappeared
gradually
with the changing weather conditions.
Many
animals
in wild
die
due to starvation. This can
also
be avoided
in zoos.
Additionally
,
some
wild
animals
like deer have
so
protection from other wild
animals
.
Animals
like lions, tigers kill other
animals
that
live
in the forest for their survival. This
also
can
be avoided
in zoos.
Alternatively
, to preserve
animals
like tigers that are reducing in number, there are
various
foundations in
different
countries. One such organization is black jaguar white tiger. It is
different
from zoo, here the
animals
are taken
proper care and are
also
provided with the
habitat
that they would
live
in.
In conclusion
, zoos are helpful to preserve
animals
and protect them from
various
conditions they face in wild
but
also
its necessary to provide proper
habitat
for them to
live
.