It is true that key positions in the government is possessed by youngsters. Some people think that young leaders can help their country to improve while others have a suspicion that young people are not able to do this. In my opinion, I consider that the pros are outweighed than the cons the young generation can make.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why young leaders are on suspicion of leading their countries. One reason is that young people do not attain valuable experiences in the field relating to politics because they have not faced many challenges in their career. Foreign relations play an important role in developing the economy in all nations. If this relationship is not positive, foreign trade will be stagnant. As a result, the economy could suffer from an economic crisis, which can affect the lives of many people. Secondly, the competence of the young in sitting down under pressure to make their countries better is not high. They are likely to make a big mistake and not putting all faith in their leadership is understandable.
One the other hand, it seems to me that young leaders is beneficial in some ways. Firstly, their youth is a huge advantage and allows them to be creative and up-to-date. This is likely to result in innovative breakthrough policies and styles of management. Secondly, the young have a long period of time to contribute to their nations. For example, with the same abilities and qualifications a younger candidate is more likely to be elected than an older counterpart in some countries because of his longer anticipated time of devotion to public service in the future.
In conclusion, although there are arguments that differ about appoint youngsters to important positions. It seems to me that young generations should be given opportunities to be parts of leaders in all nations.
It is true that key positions in the
government
is possessed
by youngsters.
Some
people
think
that
young
leaders
can
help
their
country
to
improve
while others have a suspicion that
young
people
are not able to do this. In my opinion, I consider that the pros
are outweighed
than the cons the
young
generation can
make
.
On the one hand, there are
some
reasons why
young
leaders
are on suspicion of leading their
countries
. One reason is that
young
people
do not attain valuable experiences in the field relating to politics
because
they have not faced
many
challenges in their career. Foreign relations play an
important
role in developing the economy in all nations. If this relationship is not
positive
, foreign trade will be stagnant.
As a result
, the economy could suffer from an economic crisis, which can affect the
lives
of
many
people
.
Secondly
, the competence of the
young
in sitting down under pressure to
make
their
countries
better is not high. They are likely to
make
a
big
mistake and not putting all faith in their leadership is understandable.
One
the other hand, it seems to me that
young
leaders
is beneficial in
some
ways.
Firstly
, their youth is a huge advantage and
allows
them to be creative and up-to-date. This is likely to result in innovative breakthrough policies and styles of management.
Secondly
, the
young
have a long period of time to contribute to their nations.
For example
, with the same abilities and qualifications a younger candidate is more likely to
be elected
than an older counterpart in
some
countries
because
of his longer anticipated time of devotion to public service in the future.
In conclusion
, although there are arguments that differ about appoint youngsters to
important
positions. It seems to me that
young
generations should be
given
opportunities to be parts of
leaders
in all nations.