Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Working at a large multinational corporation is believed to be favorable for professional and personal development to some extent. Besides, there are still many people who are convinced that a small local company can better provide promotion opportunities for workers.

Working at a large multinational corporation is believed to be favorable for professional and personal development to some extent. Besides, there are still many people who are convinced that a small local company can better provide promotion opportunities for workers. In this essay, I will analyze the reason behind two opposing views and give my personal opinion. It is understandable why many people advocate that large and multinational companies are the better choice. The merit of this is the employee may stand a chance to access other kinds of knowledge and culture, that meeting, associating and working with those colleagues and boss who have experience and proficient skills can help them to develop. In addition, they can also enhance the social relationship once they can adopt that environment. However, this also brings the disadvantage that sometimes, especially with the newbies, a too professional working environment may be unsuitable and challenging because of high expectations and requirements, even leading to the difficulty of integration. Others have reasons to support the small local company, that in those companies, the employees are capable of being easily promoted because their colleagues are not too professional and they are not supposed to be too competitive. If people target a higher position and quickly reach a better salary but not personal development and knowledge, a small company is more appropriate. Obviously, the minus point is people do not have opportunities to access distinguished skills from other employees, while those around them may even not be as experienced as them. In conclusion, large multinational corporations and small local companies have their own plus points. Employees who can deal with the challenging place and difficulties, may be able to extend such knowledge while the others can have more promotion opportunities that are also beneficial for their future careers. From my viewpoint, I would prefer the larger company, but the choice still depends on people’s inherent demands and abilities.

Working at a large multinational corporation is believed
 to be favorable for professional and personal development to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 extent. Besides
, there are still
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 who are convinced
 that a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpoorlimitedshortpaltryslightmeager
small
 local You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
 can better provide promotion opportunities for workers. In this essay, I will analyze the reason behind two opposing views and give my personal opinion.

It is understandable why This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 advocate that large and multinational You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
 are the better choice. The merit of this is the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employee
 may stand a chance to access other kinds of knowledge and culture, that meeting, associating and working with those colleagues and boss who have experience and proficient This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :proficiencies
skills
 can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 them to develop. In addition
, they can also
 enhance the social relationship once they can adopt that environment. However
, this also
 brings the disadvantage that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :in some instances
sometimes
, especially
 with the newbies, a too professional working environment may be unsuitable and challenging This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of high expectations and requirements, even leading to the difficulty of integration.

Others have reasons to support the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpoorlimitedshortpaltryslightmeager
small
 local You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
, that in those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
 are capable of being easily
 promoted This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 their colleagues are not too Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).professional, and
professional and
 they are not supposed to be too competitive. If You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 target a higher position and quickly
 reach a better salary This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 not personal development and knowledge, a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpoorlimitedshortpaltryslightmeager
small
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
 is more appropriate. Obviously
, the minus point is You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 do not have opportunities to access distinguished This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :proficiencies
skills
 from other You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
, while those around them may even not be as experienced as them.

In conclusion
, large multinational corporations and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpoorlimitedshortpaltryslightmeager
small
 local You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
 have their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 plus points. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
Employees
 who can deal with the challenging place and difficulties, may be able to extend such knowledge while the others can have more promotion opportunities that are also
 beneficial for their future careers. From my viewpoint, I would prefer the larger You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 the choice still
 depends on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people’s
 inherent demands and abilities. 