What young people should study at school has long been the subject of intense debate and this is a question that certainly does not have one correct answer.
We need to provide young people the best possible chance of doing well at school. In traditional curriculum there is a wide variety of subjects with a mix of academic and non-academic subjects. In this way a young person is formed with a rounded education. Non-academic subjects would include sports, cooking, woodwork and metalwork. I believe this is the best form of education. A young person should learn things other than academic subjects. Sport is particularly important. Young people have to learn to love sport so that they can be fit and healthy later in life. If not we will be raising an obese and unfit generation.
I totally understand the point of view that education is so important that students must be pushed as hard as possible to achieve their best. It sounds a good idea to only expose the students to academic subjects as then they can spend all of their school hours on studying areas that will get them into university and good jobs later in life. I just feel a more rounded education would produce a better individual. We must remember too that a lot of people, maybe even most people, aren‛t academically minded and would benefit more from a more vocationally based education. Forcing academic studies onto them would lead to failure and the student leaving school too early.
Therefore I agree that although a wholly academic curriculum would suit and benefit some young people, I believe that for most students non-academic subjects are important inclusions still in today‛s syllabuses.
What
young
people
should study at
school
has long been the
subject
of intense debate and this is a question that
certainly
does not have one correct answer.
We need to provide
young
people
the best possible chance of doing well at
school
. In traditional curriculum there is a wide variety of
subjects
with a mix of
academic
and non-academic
subjects
. In this way a
young
person
is formed
with a rounded
education
. Non-academic
subjects
would include sports, cooking, woodwork and metalwork. I believe this is the best form of
education
. A
young
person should learn things other than
academic
subjects
. Sport is
particularly
important
.
Young
people
have to
learn to
love
sport
so
that they can
be fit
and healthy later in life. If not we will be raising an obese and unfit generation.
I
totally
understand the point of view that
education
is
so
important
that
students
must
be pushed
as
hard
as possible to achieve their best. It sounds a
good
idea
to
only
expose the
students
to
academic
subjects
as then they can spend all of their
school
hours on studying areas that will
get
them into university and
good
jobs later in life. I
just
feel a more rounded
education
would produce a better individual. We
must
remember too that
a lot of
people
, maybe even most
people
,
aren‛t
academically
minded and would benefit more from a more
vocationally
based
education
. Forcing
academic
studies onto them would lead to failure and the
student
leaving
school
too early.
Therefore
I
agree
that although a wholly
academic
curriculum would suit and benefit
some
young
people
, I believe that for most
students
non-academic
subjects
are
important
inclusions
still
in
today
‛s syllabuses.