Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

With hindsight some countries should have carried out more rigorous contact tracing and testing at the start of the pandemic to prevent the disease spreading so widely. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

With hindsight some countries should have carried out more rigorous contact tracing and testing at the start of the pandemic to prevent the disease spreading so widely. RWAyo
There is an opinion that several countries should have reacted immediately to the situation of a new fast-speeding decease that humanity had to face. Therefore, a majority of people believe that the world could have prevented a pandemic if governments tracked contacts more closely and tested people from the start of the spread. However, I would like to support this idea if it was real because pandemics cannot be predicted in advance. To begin with, there is a misconception about the definition of a pandemic. Consequently, society tends to consider that early action to control the disease could stop the spread. In reality, however, it is almost impossible to predict the nature of a new virus which means that it minimizes the ability of the government to create a perfectly working monitor system. For instance, in the December of 2019, Covid-19 hit the world with its unknown structure. As a result, countries did not have enough knowledge of how to organize and test their residence. Furthermore, when a disease turns into a pandemic and this usually happens quite quickly it becomes difficult to control at the state level. Thus, the responsibility of privation of new cases falls in part on the shoulders of individuals. It means that following the recommendation of the government, people could stop a pandemic at the beginning. For example, covid-19 could have stopped initially if people and a government worked together. In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the opinion that pandemic situations could be prevented by government reaction to a new unknown illness. Humans are not good at future prediction, especially in diseases. Nobody can tell the structure of new viruses; therefore, it is impossible to provide inhabitants with a control system on time. Moreover, humans should work together with a government against a virus in order to suppress a flash.
There is an opinion that several countries should have reacted immediately to the situation of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
-speeding decease that humanity had to face.
Therefore
, a majority of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
believe that the world could have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevented
a pandemic if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tracked
contacts more
closely
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
of the spread.
However
, I would like to support this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
if it was real
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pandemics
cannot
be predicted
in advance.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, there is a misconception about the definition of a pandemic.
Consequently
, society tends to consider that early action to control the disease could
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
the spread. In reality,
however
, it is almost impossible to predict the nature of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
virus which means that it minimizes the ability of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
to create a
perfectly
working monitor system.
For instance
, in the
When specifying a month and year, 'of' is unnecessary: "December 2019".
December of 2019
, Covid-19 hit the world with its unknown structure.
As a result
, countries did not have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
knowledge of how to organize and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
their residence.

Furthermore
, when a disease turns into a pandemic and this
usually
happens quite
quickly
it becomes difficult to control at the state level.
Thus
, the responsibility of privation of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
cases falls in part on the shoulders of individuals. It means that following the recommendation of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
could
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
a pandemic at the beginning.
For example
,
Did you mean "COVID-19" or the alternative spelling "Covid-19" (= coronavirus)?
covid-19
could have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stopped
initially
if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
and a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
worked together.

In conclusion
, I
strongly
disagree with the opinion that pandemic situations could be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevented
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
reaction to a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
unknown illness. Humans are not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
at future prediction,
especially
in diseases. Nobody can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tell
the structure of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
viruses;
therefore
, it is impossible to provide inhabitants with a control system on time.
Moreover
, humans should work together with a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
against a virus in order to suppress a flash.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay With hindsight some countries should have carried out more rigorous contact tracing and testing at the start of the pandemic to prevent the disease spreading so widely.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
305 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • With hindsight some countries should have carried out more rigorous contact tracing and testing at the start of the pandemic to prevent the disease spreading so widely. To what extent do you agree with this statement?