Even if a team is balanced in skill set, personality clashes can also cause an argument. Conflict may arise because of differences in communication styles or approaches to work. The student with strong personalities can make it challenging for others to contribute feedback because they would find it hard to accept others ideas or criticism from their peers. While student who is quiet often have difficulties in expressing their ideas and feel uncomfortable to speak for theirself. This problem may make students feel undesired by their team, causing their contributions to be devalued. As a result, they stop offering their idea or encouraging innovation when their idea might be the best for the team, which leads to the issue with team cohesion and cooperation, reducing chances of creativity. This type of argument can damage morale, efficiency and negatively impact the student’s enjoyment in that class. Therefore, working alone is better than working in a group.
Even if a
team
is balanced
in
skill
set, personality clashes can
also
cause an argument. Conflict may arise
because
of differences in communication styles or approaches to work. The
student
with strong personalities can
make
it challenging for others to contribute feedback
because
they would find it
hard
to accept others
ideas
or criticism from their peers. While
student
who is
quiet
often
have difficulties in expressing their
ideas
and feel uncomfortable to speak for
theirself
. This problem may
make
students
feel undesired by their
team
, causing their contributions to
be devalued
.
As a result
, they
stop
offering their
idea
or encouraging innovation when their
idea
might be the best for the
team
, which leads to the issue with
team
cohesion and cooperation, reducing chances of creativity. This type of argument can damage morale, efficiency and
negatively
impact the
student’s
enjoyment in that
class
.
Therefore
, working alone is better than working in a group.