The effects of the government's sudden decision to increase the price of diesel and kerosene by 23 percent have been immediate and reverberating. With transport workers on strike, buses were nowhere to be seen starting Friday and commuters had to resort to more expensive modes of transport. Some walked long distances to reach their destination and avoid the hefty costs of alternate transportation. Many were not even aware of the transport strike—reasonably so, given the abruptness of the situation—and missed interviews, exams (including admission tests to seven DU-affiliated colleges) and other pressing appointments.
Meanwhile, launch owners also submitted a proposal to the chairman of Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority on Friday to double their fare and began suspending their services this afternoon, citing the hike in fuel prices. It is inevitable that this price hike will also affect the prices of imported goods, slow down exports (or make them more expensive if companies have to opt for air shipment), and increase production costs of local goods overall. We cannot imagine that the authorities could not have foreseen this outcome, not only based on past experiences but also on sheer common sense. Yet, sudden decisions such as this always seem to signal their disconnect with the experiences of the general public. To top this off, transport leaders, after meeting today with the home minister, decided to carry on with the strike until authorities decide on either raising fares or cutting fuel prices.
The government body tasked with fixing bus fares according to new fuel prices is set to meet tomorrow. If past incidents are anything to go by—for instance, the delay in implementing the Road Transport Act 2018 which would impose hefty fines on unfit vehicles—it is not impossible that the authorities will side with transport owners (many of whom are often linked to politically influential members of society) and give in to their demand of raising fares for commuters. It seems it is always the general public who must bear the burden of such abrupt government decisions, in the short-term and in the long-term.
We would urge the government to take into account the suffering of both businesses and members of the public when arriving at a decision that will end the transport strike. While we firmly believe there should have been more forethought exercised before imposing such a sudden hike in the price of something as essential as fuel, the authorities must do more to end this culture of random strikes by transport owners and workers that hold the country hostage and ultimately affect ordinary citizens the most. We also hope that this will act as a lesson learned when taking such decisions in the future.
The effects of the
government
's sudden
decision
to increase the
price
of diesel and kerosene by 23 percent have been immediate and reverberating. With
transport
workers on
strike
, buses were nowhere to be
seen
starting Friday and commuters had to resort to more expensive modes of
transport
.
Some
walked long distances to reach their destination and avoid the hefty costs of alternate transportation.
Many
were not even aware of the
transport
strike—
reasonably
so
,
given
the abruptness of the situation—and missed interviews, exams (including admission
tests
to seven DU-affiliated colleges) and other pressing appointments.
Meanwhile, launch owners
also
submitted a proposal to the chairman of Bangladesh Inland Water
Transport
Authority
on Friday to double their
fare
and began suspending their services this afternoon, citing the hike in
fuel
prices
. It is inevitable that this
price
hike will
also
affect the
prices
of imported
goods
, slow down exports (or
make
them more expensive if
companies
have to
opt for air shipment), and increase production costs of local
goods
overall
. We cannot imagine that the
authorities
could not have foreseen this outcome, not
only
based on
past experiences
but
also
on sheer common sense.
Yet
, sudden
decisions
such as this always seem to signal their disconnect with the experiences of the
general public
. To top this off,
transport
leaders, after meeting
today
with the home minister, decided to carry on with the
strike
until
authorities
decide on either raising
fares
or cutting
fuel
prices.
The
government
body tasked with fixing bus
fares
according to new
fuel
prices
is set
to
meet
tomorrow. If past incidents are anything to go by—
for instance
, the delay in implementing the Road
Transport
Act 2018 which would impose hefty fines on unfit vehicles—it is not impossible that the
authorities
will side with
transport
owners (
many
of whom are
often
linked to
politically
influential members of society) and give in to their demand of raising
fares
for commuters. It seems it is always the
general public
who
must
bear the burden of such abrupt
government
decisions
, in the short-term and in the long-term.
We would urge the
government
to take into account the suffering of both businesses and members of the public when arriving at a
decision
that will
end
the
transport
strike
. While we
firmly
believe there should have been more forethought exercised
before
imposing such a sudden hike in the
price
of something as essential as
fuel
, the
authorities
must
do more to
end
this culture of random
strikes
by
transport
owners and workers that hold the country hostage and
ultimately
affect ordinary citizens the most. We
also
hope that this will act as a lesson learned when taking such
decisions
in the future.