There is a hot debate whether the government should spend money supporting artists or those people should receive finance from other sources. I believe that artists earning money by themselves are preferable.
There are several reasons why artists require help from the state. To start with, artworks represent the culture, heritage, and history of a nation, receiving national authorities’s budget is properly reasonable.
For example, Quang Trung is famous for being a hero of the Vietnamese people. Therefore, he stands for sprits of our patriotism, a period we had to go against the invaders to protect our countries, he was sculptured in the pedestrian street. Then the foreigners coming to Vietnam and the young generation that sees his statue can acknowledge the mental values of Vietnamese people. Undeniably, governments and local councils should pay for the artists who create those sculptures to preserve the Vietnamese heritage.
Notwithstanding the great benefits of subsidizing money for the artists, there are also some arguments against this trend. First and foremost, the governments have other concerns, and some issues needed to be addressed immediately. For instance, those problems related to education, infrastructures, healthcare need money from the state Those fields play a pivotal role in the development of nations and should be spent money on rather than artworks. Another point worth noting is that artists do the job like any other professional, so they should earn income by themselves.
In conclusion, while I accept that it is reasonable for governments to subsidize money for the artists, I lean towards the idea that artists should make income by selling their artworks.
There is a hot debate whether the
government
should spend
money
supporting
artists
or those
people
should receive finance from other sources. I believe that
artists
earning
money
by themselves are preferable.
There are several reasons why
artists
require
help
from the state. To
start
with, artworks represent the culture, heritage, and history of a nation, receiving national
authorities’s
budget is
properly
reasonable.
For example
,
Quang
Trung
is
famous
for being a hero of the Vietnamese
people
.
Therefore
, he stands for
sprits
of our patriotism, a period we had to go against the invaders to protect our countries, he
was sculptured
in the pedestrian street. Then the foreigners coming to Vietnam and the young generation that
sees
his statue can acknowledge the mental values of Vietnamese
people
.
Undeniably
,
governments
and local councils should pay for the
artists
who create those sculptures to preserve the Vietnamese heritage.
Notwithstanding the great benefits of subsidizing
money
for the
artists
, there are
also
some
arguments against this trend.
First
and foremost, the
governments
have other concerns, and
some
issues needed to
be addressed
immediately.
For instance
, those problems related to education, infrastructures, healthcare need
money
from the state Those fields play a pivotal role in the development of nations and should
be spent
money
on
rather
than artworks. Another point worth noting is that
artists
do the job like any other professional,
so
they should earn income by themselves.
In conclusion
, while I accept that it is reasonable for
governments
to subsidize
money
for the
artists
, I lean towards the
idea
that
artists
should
make
income by selling their artworks.