Nowadays, numerous countries around the world include inhabitants from different cultures and nationalities. While a number of crowd argue that this decreases the level of authenticity within these countries, others ensure that this kind of variety among citizens help countries thrive on distinct levels in addition to making these geographic locations more intriguing to live in. In this essay, I will illustrate why the latter argument is more compatible with my way of thinking.
A prime reason for rapid development in multicultural regions is that community from distinctive backgrounds are exposed to contrasting experiences in life. Consequently, learning curve for these society will be acquired through shorter amount of time. Moreover, these nation will be more willing to adopt this rapid change due to the fact they can evaluate its outcome first hand. For instance, a recent Cambridge study has concluded that professional sport players who have international teammates develop faster than other players who do not get this opportunity.
Also, life in such cities is prone to be more interesting due to the fact that a person can try new activities more frequently. The reason for this is that different cultures have miscellaneous habits in eating, playing, clothing, or even having fun. For example, while in London, which is a multinational city, you can try a different kind of food almost every day without repeating the same cuisine twice for a whole year.
In conclusion, while a number of people might say that homogeneous societies are better for development, I utterly disagree with that argument. In the contrary, I think that multinational societies are more interesting and can develop more efficiently
Nowadays, numerous countries around the world include inhabitants from
different
cultures and nationalities. While a number of crowd argue that this decreases the level of authenticity within these countries, others ensure that this kind of variety among citizens
help
countries thrive on distinct levels
in addition
to making these geographic locations more intriguing to
live
in. In this essay, I will illustrate why the latter argument is more compatible with my way of thinking.
A prime reason for rapid development in multicultural regions is that community from distinctive backgrounds
are exposed
to contrasting experiences in life.
Consequently
, learning curve for
these society
will
be acquired
through shorter amount of time.
Moreover
,
these nation
will be more willing to adopt this rapid
change
due to the fact they can evaluate its outcome
first
hand.
For instance
, a recent Cambridge study has concluded that professional sport players who have international teammates develop faster than other players who do not
get
this opportunity.
Also
, life in such cities is prone to be more interesting due to the fact that a person can try new activities more
frequently
.
The reason for this is
that
different
cultures have miscellaneous habits in eating, playing, clothing, or even having fun.
For example
, while in London, which is a multinational city, you can try a
different
kind of food almost every day without repeating the same cuisine twice for a whole year.
In conclusion
, while a number of
people
might say that homogeneous societies are better for development, I
utterly
disagree with that argument. In the contrary, I
think
that multinational societies are more interesting and can develop more
efficiently