Whether a online or printed resources should be preferred to impart how to read is a contentious debate. In my perspective, printed sources have far more benefits in terms of convenience factor as well as few demerits online sources have.
On the one hand, technological devices especially mobile phones and portable devices have paved the way to access information among the world. In other words, globally written books and literatures can easily get through these technical gadgets; as a result, people will have wide choices to pick up materials they want in order to read. Moreover, it is generally believed that these books have different vocabulary and distinct patterns or styles of writting languages. Indeedly, there is availability of pronunciation facility too. Therefore, mistakes of mispronounced words could be avoided.
On the other hand, some people often claimed that conventional way of reading would be more beneficial as compared to online copies. This is because it is undeniable that mobile phones and tablets are much expensive to afford. However, people will face more challenges to understand foreign languages, particularly French and Spanish. Despite these issues, traditional newspapers and native books are best way to inculcate for the purpose of purpose. This is to say, many individuals can feel convenient along with their hectic schedules as it also eliminate the strain that electronics have created. For instance, a survey conducted by 'the hindu' newspaper had suggested that more and more elderly people and mid 40's aged group were more proficient in reading their native countries periodicals compared to utilization of online sources.
In conclusion, although technology has made bridge to get exposed to learn how to read through worldwide written books and few options available to enhance reading, but the fact of satisfaction and affordability factor that printed resources have provided will be more in use in future
Whether
a
online
or printed resources should
be preferred
to impart how to read is a contentious debate. In my perspective, printed sources have far more benefits in terms of convenience factor
as well
as few demerits
online
sources have.
On the one hand, technological devices
especially
mobile phones and portable devices have paved the way to access information among the world.
In other words
, globally written
books
and literatures can
easily
get
through these technical gadgets;
as a result
,
people
will have wide choices to pick up materials they want in order to read.
Moreover
, it is
generally
believed that these
books
have
different
vocabulary and distinct patterns or styles of
writting
languages.
Indeedly
, there is availability of pronunciation facility too.
Therefore
, mistakes of mispronounced words could
be avoided
.
On the other hand
,
some
people
often
claimed that conventional way of reading would be more beneficial as compared to
online
copies. This is
because
it is undeniable that mobile phones and tablets are much expensive to afford.
However
,
people
will face more challenges
to understand
foreign languages,
particularly
French and Spanish. Despite these issues,
traditional newspapers and native
books
are best
way to inculcate for the purpose of purpose. This is to say,
many
individuals can feel convenient along with their hectic schedules as it
also
eliminate the strain that electronics have created.
For instance
, a survey conducted by 'the
hindu
' newspaper had suggested that more and more elderly
people
and mid
40's
aged group were more proficient in reading their native countries periodicals compared to utilization of
online
sources.
In conclusion
, although technology has made bridge to
get
exposed to learn how to read through worldwide written
books
and few options available to enhance reading,
but
the fact of satisfaction and affordability factor that printed resources have provided will be more in
use
in future