Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

What is dual model, explain its types

What is dual model, explain its types jRkQL

A dual model is a prototype that gives us complacency in the method of handling the conflict, moreover, it is called the solution to the negotiation between two parties. Besides this, it explains the ways employed to deal with conflict and is of five types- Contending, Yielding, Compromising, Problem Solving and Inaction. Contending- When two magnanimous employees working in the same department request for leave from their manager by telling two different reasons at the same time. The first employee embellish his reason for the leave and request his boss in a punctilious manner, on the other hand, The second employee too became pompous and expound his problem to their head for a day off. The overall situation is characterized by the expression- " I win you lose" from the one who gets the leave to the other party. Yielding- During the preposterous argument, a person tends to lose the argument despite being right at his place, this phenomenon is referred to as yielding, as instead of contending and arguing, he resolves the conundrum by proving himself wrong. We often let people win the negotiation because we know that there are much more important things other than this in our lives and for sure, we will win the next time we get an opportunity. Problem Solving- This is also called the win-win situation, as when two dextrous and punctilious person works together they beside seeing their profit also propound the other person working with them. Moreover, they neither want them to fail nor they think of any repulsive plan to make other people lose because they want to work together by resolving the conflict. Inaction- It is the situation when you and another person's outcome are of no importance and both are uselessly squandering your energy by fighting, so this phenomena i. e inaction describes that one must walk away from the situation instead of being ominous. Compromising- It is the point in our life when 2 friends are arguing and knows both are wrong egregious at some point. At this place, in particular, they must be magnanimous and try to adjust to the situation. The overall process is referred to as compromising.

A dual model is a prototype that gives us complacency in the method of handling the conflict, moreover
, it is called
 the solution to the negotiation between two parties. Besides
 this, it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :interprets
explains
 the ways employed to deal with conflict and is of five types- Contending, Yielding, Compromising, Problem Solving and Inaction.

Contending- When two magnanimous employees working in the same department request for This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :depart
leave
 from their manager by telling two This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 reasons at the same time. The first
 employee embellish his reason for the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :depart
leave
 and request his boss Consider replacing "in a punctilious manner" with the adverb for "punctilious"; e.g., "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
in a punctilious manner
, on the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 hand, The second employee too became pompous and expound his problem to their head for a day off. The overall
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withposition
situation
is characterized
 by the expression- Don't put a space on both sides of a quote symbolapply
" 
I win you loseUse a smart closing quote here: "”".”
"
 from the one who This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquires
gets
 the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :depart
leave
 to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 party.

Yielding- During the preposterous argument, a person tends to lose the argument despite being right at his place, this phenomenon is referred
 to as yielding, as instead
 of contending and arguing, he resolves the conundrum by proving himself This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:incorrect
wrong
. We This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:frequently
often
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :authorize
let
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 win the negotiation This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 we know that there are much more This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
 things You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 than this in our This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
 and for sure, we will win the next
 time we This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 an opportunity.

Problem Solving- This is also
 called the win-win You use this word too often, consider replacing it withposition
situation
, as when two Possible spelling mistake found.dexterous
dextrous
 and punctilious Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: "people", "persons".peoplepersons
person
 works together they beside seeing their profit also
 propound the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 person working with them. Moreover
, they neither want them to Use a comma before 'nor' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).fail, nor
fail nor
 they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 of any repulsive plan to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 lose This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 they want to work together by resolving the conflict.

Inaction- It is the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withposition
situation
 when you and another person's outcome are of no importance and both are uselessly
 squandering your energy by fighting, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
Did you mean "these"?these
this
 phenomena i. e inaction This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :characterizesportrays
describes
 that one This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
 walk away from the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withposition
situation
instead
 of being ominous.

Compromising- It is the point in our life when 2 friends are arguing and knows both are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:incorrect
wrong
 egregious at This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 point. At this place, in particular
, they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
 be magnanimous and try to adjust to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withposition
situation
. The overall
 process is referred
 to as compromising. 