Some people argue that rich nations must provide humanitarian relief to developing countries in case of natural calamities. This essay agrees with the statement because they have enough supplies and money to do so and this will help the country to recover faster.
Firstly, developed countries have high gross domestic production or overall income than others as a result they can spend most of their money and still have enough for them. These countries should come forward and take relevant steps to help the countries in need. Advanced countries have many multinational companies, do more trades, and involve infrequent exports and imports to gain power and riches. For instance, well-established countries like the US and UK can help the countries in which people are under the poverty line and the governments who do not have enough supplies and funds to help the people. These countries also have more laboratories, scientists, and medical equipment so they can help the needy countries with their achievements and possessions.
Secondly, poorer countries will recover more quickly if they receive assistance from these high-level countries. Normally, during natural calamities like earthquakes, floods and storms and if the impact is devastating it may take ages for the countries to recover and come back to their natural position. Moreover, the financial, medical, and military aid from richer countries not only make the process of recovery faster and also more efficient. For example, recent studies have shown that India took nearly 2 years to recover from the 2004 tsunami and it could have made the process more rapid and smooth if other countries had helped.
In conclusion, I think countries with more GDP and income should help and give hand to undeveloped countries in the time of natural calamities as they have more money and authority and it would make the whole recovering process quick.
Some
people
argue that rich nations
must
provide humanitarian relief to developing
countries
in case of
natural
calamities. This essay
agrees
with the statement
because
they have
enough
supplies and money to do
so
and this will
help
the
country
to
recover
faster.
Firstly
, developed
countries
have high gross domestic production or
overall
income than others
as a result
they can spend most of their money and
still
have
enough
for them. These
countries
should
come
forward and take relevant steps to
help
the
countries
in need. Advanced
countries
have
many
multinational
companies
, do more trades, and involve infrequent exports and imports to gain power and riches.
For instance
, well-established
countries
like the US and UK can
help
the
countries
in which
people
are under the poverty line and the
governments
who do not have
enough
supplies and funds to
help
the
people
. These
countries
also
have more laboratories, scientists, and medical equipment
so
they can
help
the needy
countries
with their achievements and possessions.
Secondly
, poorer
countries
will
recover
more
quickly
if they receive assistance from these high-level
countries
.
Normally
, during
natural
calamities like earthquakes, floods and storms and if the impact is devastating it may take ages for the
countries
to
recover
and
come
back to their
natural
position.
Moreover
, the financial, medical, and military aid from richer
countries
not
only
make
the process of recovery faster and
also
more efficient.
For example
, recent studies have shown that India took
nearly
2 years to
recover
from the 2004 tsunami and it could have made the process more rapid and smooth if other
countries
had
helped
.
In conclusion
, I
think
countries
with more GDP and income should
help
and give hand to undeveloped
countries
in the time of
natural
calamities as they have more money and authority and it would
make
the whole recovering process quick.