Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Validity and reliability Analysis of multiple choice item evaluation instrument for measuring HOTS in the context of general chemistry

Validity and reliability Analysis of multiple choice item evaluation instrument for measuring HOTS in the context of general chemistry w5jn
Providing valid and reliable items is necessary for the instrument evaluation tool. The instrument which is being used at school is lacked measuring students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). This study examined the validity and reliability of developed multiple-choice item evaluation instruments for measuring higher-order thinking skills. The instrument test was developed based on the cognitive domain of Bloom’s Taxonomy. It consists of 45 multiple choice items and was distributed randomly to 151 senior high school students. The method was conducted by using a quantitative method which consists of three phases: Content Validity by inter-rater agreement, Construct validity by principal component analysis (PCA), and Reliability shown by Chronbach Alpha. The students’ outcomes were analyzed The content validity by inter-rater agreement found that the instrument was categorized as valid. The construct validity by PCA found that each item in the evaluation instrument measured one-dimensionality which good to be used as an evaluation instrument test. The instrument was found to have a high degree of reliability with Chronbach Alpha of 0, 94. The multiple-choice item was found to be good for measuring HOTS by comparing the outcomes and skills of the students. From the result of this study, a valid and reliable multiple-choice item evaluation instrument has been produced and the items were properly proved to be good for measuring HOTS.
Providing valid and reliable
items
is necessary for the
instrument
evaluation
tool. The
instrument
which is being
used
at school
is lacked
measuring
students’
higher-order thinking
skills
(HOTS). This study examined the
validity
and reliability of developed multiple-choice
item
evaluation
instruments
for measuring higher-order thinking
skills
. The
instrument
test
was developed
based on the cognitive domain of Bloom’s Taxonomy. It consists of 45 multiple choice
items
and
was distributed
randomly
to 151 senior high school
students
. The method
was conducted
by using a quantitative method which consists of three phases: Content
Validity
by inter-rater agreement, Construct
validity
by principal component analysis (PCA), and Reliability shown by
Chronbach
Alpha. The
students’
outcomes
were analyzed
The content
validity
by inter-rater agreement
found
that the
instrument
was categorized
as valid.
The
construct
validity
by PCA
found
that each
item
in the
evaluation
instrument
measured one-dimensionality which
good
to be
used
as an
evaluation
instrument
test
.
The
instrument
was
found
to have a high degree of reliability with
Chronbach
Alpha of 0, 94.
The
multiple-choice
item
was
found
to be
good
for measuring HOTS by comparing the outcomes and
skills
of the
students
. From the result of this study, a valid and reliable multiple-choice
item
evaluation
instrument
has
been produced
and the
items
were
properly
proved to be
good
for measuring HOTS.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Validity and reliability Analysis of multiple choice item evaluation instrument for measuring HOTS in the context of general chemistry

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
218 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts