Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Using animals to test the safety of cosmetics or drugs used for medical reasons is never acceptable. to what extent do you agree with this statement? v.1

Using animals to test the safety of cosmetics or drugs used for medical reasons is never acceptable. v. 1
No one would argue that animals are widely used for the evaluation of medicines and cosmetics effects. This trend prompts a controversial topic whether this method is against animal right and moral obligations, thus should be banned or it is vital for the human health needed to be used. I adamantly disagree with the point of view that the usage of animals for medical purposes is never acceptable. I believe this method should be moderately used but strictly monitored. First and foremost, sustainable healthcare and cosmetics development will be achieved merely by this process. Without any doubt, drugs are indispensable for the survival of the humanity and it is an unavoidable fact that cosmetics are widely used in whole societies in today' s world as well. Accordingly, since the effectiveness of the wide range of these products cannot be evaluated on humans out of the life threating risks they might have, there would be no other alternatives rather than using animals. Therefore, there is a strong correlation between using animals as test subjects and the invention of new products. on the other hand, it is scientifically proved that anatomy of the human is far more complex than animals. Human body evolves through the time and myriads environmental factors have impacted it. therefore, the performance of some elements used in producing a specific drug can only assess in isolated species with simpler body functions. It should be stressed that for preserving animal rights, this process should be severely monitored by the government and related organization. there should be certain regulations regarding experimenting on animals. for instance, the British government introduced a law that has allowed pharmacy researchers to utilize animals as test subjects which are already suffering from an illness. In a nutshell, it is essential to make use of animals for creating and developing medicines and cosmetic products. Owing to the fact that some of these experiments can have human casualties. In addition, a numerous of these tests can only be conducted on animals with an uncomplex anatomy. However, in order to preserve animal rights, strict surveillance on these process should be regulated.
No one would argue that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are
widely
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for the evaluation of medicines and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cosmetics
effects. This trend prompts a controversial topic whether this method is against
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
right and moral obligations,
thus
should
be banned
or it is vital for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
health needed to be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
. I
adamantly
disagree with the point of view that the usage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for medical purposes is never acceptable. I believe this method should be
moderately
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
strictly
monitored.

First
and foremost, sustainable healthcare and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cosmetics
development will
be achieved
merely
by this process. Without any doubt, drugs are indispensable for the survival of the humanity and it is an unavoidable fact that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cosmetics
are
widely
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
in whole societies in
Possible spelling mistake found.
today&
#039; s world
as well
.
Accordingly
, since the effectiveness of the wide range of these products cannot
be evaluated
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
out of the life
Possible spelling mistake found.
threating
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
risks
they might have, there would be no other alternatives
rather
than using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
Therefore
, there is a strong correlation between using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
as
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
subjects and the invention of new products.

This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
on
the other hand, it is
scientifically
proved that anatomy of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
is far more complex than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Human
body evolves through the time and myriads environmental factors have impacted it.
therefore
, the performance of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
elements
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
in producing a specific drug can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
assess in isolated species with simpler body functions.

It should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stressed
that for preserving
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
rights, this process should be
severely
monitored by the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
and related organization.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
there
should be certain regulations regarding experimenting on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
for
instance, the British
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
introduced a law that has
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
allowed
pharmacy researchers to utilize
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
as
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
subjects which are already suffering from an illness.

In a nutshell, it is essential to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for creating and developing medicines and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cosmetic
products. Owing to the fact that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
of these experiments can have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
casualties.
In addition
,
The phrase 'a numerous of' is not correct. Use a noun, not an adjective, between 'a' and 'of'.
a numerous of
these
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
be conducted
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
with an
Possible spelling mistake found.
uncomplex
anatomy.
However
, in order to preserve
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
rights, strict surveillance on these process should
be regulated
.
13Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
21Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes
To have another language is to possess a second soul.
Charlemagne

IELTS essay Using animals to test the safety of cosmetics or drugs used for medical reasons is never acceptable. v. 1

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
353 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts