In this argument, the author claims that national aeronautical organization need to invest resouces in unmanned space rather than manned due to negligible cost and risks. To bolster his standing, the arguer cites some pieces of evidence. The argument seems logical at first glance, it has been flawed with some unwarranted assumptions that need to be justified.
Firstly, the argument based on the refernce of a letter that has been sent by someone to the editor of anational aeronautics magazine. However, the author did not mention any information about the person who gives the letter. In this stage, the argument flawed with lots of queries. For instance, Who sent the letter to the editorial body? Is he a authentic person or a researcher? It seems that there remains an urge of knowing the answers. Without these, the argument may not be blindly believed.
Secondly, the another problemetic issue with the argument that, the author explains that manned space flight is costly and dangerous compare to the unmanned one. The author also mentioned that he reaches in that conclusion observing the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites. Although there is no such evidence of the number of manned and unmanned space flight based on what he provides the statement. For example, it can happen that while doing thes survey, he considered five manned space, on the other hand, in case of unmanned space probe he took twenty-five unmanned space. Another question arises about the survey committee; Who did the survey? Before holding the argument as indeed one, the author need to justified these with concrete evidences.
Thirdly, the arguer assumed that useful information can be gleaned from the unmanned space without costs and risks. But human beings are intellectual one compare to the unmanned one. There may have some other reasons because of human can give better
To recapitulate, the number of unwarranted assumtions, in the previous sections, questions about the validity of the argument. Unless these are properly addressed with citing some veritable proof, the argument will still be fallacious.
In this
argument
, the
author
claims that national aeronautical organization need to invest
resouces
in unmanned
space
rather
than
manned
due to negligible cost and
risks
. To bolster his standing, the arguer cites
some
pieces of evidence. The
argument
seems logical at
first
glance, it has
been flawed
with
some
unwarranted assumptions that need to
be justified
.
Firstly
, the
argument
based on the
refernce
of a letter that has been
sent
by someone to the editor of
anational
aeronautics magazine.
However
, the
author
did not mention any information about the person who gives the letter. In this stage, the
argument
flawed with lots of queries.
For instance
, Who
sent
the letter to the editorial body? Is he
a
authentic person or a researcher? It seems that there remains an urge of knowing the answers. Without these, the
argument
may not be
blindly
believed.
Secondly
, the another
problemetic
issue with the
argument
that, the
author
explains
that
manned
space
flight is costly and
dangerous
compare to the unmanned one. The
author
also
mentioned that he reaches in that conclusion observing the recent success of a series of unmanned
space
probes and satellites. Although there is no such evidence of the number of
manned
and unmanned
space
flight based on what he provides the statement.
For example
, it can happen that while doing
thes
survey, he considered five
manned
space
,
on the other hand
, in case of unmanned
space
probe he took twenty-five unmanned
space
. Another question arises about the survey committee; Who did the survey?
Before
holding the
argument
as
indeed
one, the
author
need
to justified
these with concrete evidences.
Thirdly
, the arguer assumed that useful information can
be gleaned
from the unmanned
space
without costs and
risks
.
But
human beings are intellectual one compare to the unmanned one. There may have
some
other reasons
because
of human can give
better
To recapitulate, the number of unwarranted
assumtions
, in the previous sections, questions about the validity of the
argument
. Unless these are
properly
addressed with citing
some
veritable proof, the
argument
will
still
be fallacious.