Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. 8555G
For judgement of criminal cases, past criminal backgound information is not accessible by jury which can lead to protects criminal. There is a advise from few layers that before reaching any decision of a criminal case jury should be given access to past criminal records. As per my opinion jury must have access to all past records for any criminal. On the one side, if juri doesn't have access to past records for any criminal and so it can lead to protect the criminal for a crime or it might be possible that criminal can get protected. For example if anyone who did lot of crime and went to prison for different types of small crime and later he did some other crime and suppose case is coming to juri to solve it and if they don't have past records of that criminal they could punish him like for some small fine because they don't have information about past records. On the other hand, I think if juri has access to past criminal records about any accused they will be able to take proper decision. When juri has access to past recods for any accused they see how many time he did crime and what types of crime he did and based on all these information they will decide which kind of punishment should be given in order to protect society and people. And this is even good for society because whenever any criminal think for a new crime then he should be thinking that juri also has access to his past records and by this way we can say that criminal may changed their mind and they will not do crime anymore. So based on above I can say that post criminal records access should be given to juri, which will help them to take proper required decesion to accused.
For judgement of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
cases,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
Possible spelling mistake found.
backgound
information is not accessible by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
which can lead to protects
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
. There is
Use "an" instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
a
Did you mean "advice" (noun)?
advise
from few layers that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
reaching any decision of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
case
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
access
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
records
. As per my opinion
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
access
to all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
records
for any criminal.

On the one side, if
Possible spelling mistake found.
juri
doesn't have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
access
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
records
for any
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
it can lead to protect the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
for a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crime
or it might be possible that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
protected.
For example
if anyone who did
It seems that an article is missing.
lot of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crime
and went to prison for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
types of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crime
and later he did
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crime
and suppose case is coming to
Possible spelling mistake found.
juri
to solve it and if they don't have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
records
of that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
they could punish him like for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
Did you mean "smalls"?
small
fine
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
they don't have information about
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
records.

On the other hand
, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
if
Possible spelling mistake found.
juri
has
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
access
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
records
about any accused they will be able to take proper decision. When
Possible spelling mistake found.
juri
has
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
access
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
Possible spelling mistake found.
recods
for any accused they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
how
Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: "many times".
many time
he did
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crime
and what types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crime
he did and based on all
Did you mean "this information" or "these informations"?
these information
they will decide which kind of punishment should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
in order to protect society and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
. And this is even
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
for society
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
whenever any
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
for a new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crime
then he should be thinking that
Possible spelling mistake found.
juri
also
has
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
access
to his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
records
and by this way we can say that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
may
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changed
their
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
mind and
they will not do
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crime
anymore.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
based on above I can say that post
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
records
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
access
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
to
Possible spelling mistake found.
juri
, which will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
them to take proper required
Possible spelling mistake found.
decesion
Did you mean "to accuse"?
to accused
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
311 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.