Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer. v.2

Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. v. 2
The written documents of a country that give justice of a country is called law. A country contains both criminal and civil laws, and ensure the judicial system. Some countries give permission of accessing the criminal's previous history, while others do not. It is sometimes essential to know an offender's past activity during a prosecution. Most of the countries around the world follow this system, but some particular nations do not. They only consider the current offences of a person commit, which probably sometimes violate human right. In this system a judicial board can not judge a criminal case properly. For example, someone having a licenced revolver shoots to save his life, and surrenders before the law. It should not be legal to ignore his prior life history as well as occupation during the prosecution, and give him death sentences. On the contrary, if the jury board is taken into consideration the offender's past delinquent documents, it will consume time to give the judgement. Besides, it will need more financial support for the complainant to continue the incident. Additionally, this might give mental strength to the accused person. Furthermore, the lengthy prosecution process may not give a right decision. The reason is, the financial support of a criminal may pressurise the dilator, and there might be a possibility to withdraw the fact. As a result, the jury-board, dismisses the case, and the perpetrator remains unpunished. In conclusion, it can be said that, avoiding the criminal's previous offensive reports lessen the time to complete the event. This process, however, bears a chance of giving improper punishment to the offender. It is, therefore, necessary to go through the perpetrator's evil-deeds reports thoroughly to give a right decision.
The written documents of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
give
justice of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
is called
law. A
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
contains both criminal and civil laws, and ensure the judicial system.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
give
permission of accessing the criminal's previous history, while others do not.

It is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
essential to know an offender's past activity during a prosecution. Most of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
around the world follow this system,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
particular nations do not. They
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
consider the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
Possible spelling mistake. 'offences' is British English.
offences
of a person commit, which
probably
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
violate human right.

In this system a judicial board can not judge a criminal case
properly
.
For example
, someone
The pronoun 'someone' is usually used with a third-person or a past tense verb: "has", "had".
having
a
Possible spelling mistake found.
licenced
revolver shoots to save his life, and surrenders
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
the law. It should not be legal to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ignore
his prior life history
as well
as occupation during the prosecution, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
give
him death sentences.

On the contrary
, if the jury board
is taken
into consideration the offender's past delinquent documents, it will consume time to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
give
the judgement.
Besides
, it will need more financial support for the complainant to continue the incident.
Additionally
, this might
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
give
mental strength to the accused person.

Furthermore
, the lengthy prosecution process may not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
give
a right decision. The reason is, the financial support of a criminal may
Possible spelling mistake. 'pressurise' is British English.
pressurise
the dilator, and there might be a possibility to withdraw the fact.
As a result
, the jury-board, dismisses the case, and the perpetrator remains unpunished.

In conclusion
, it can
be said
that, avoiding the criminal's previous offensive reports lessen the time to complete the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
event
. This process,
however
, bears a chance of giving improper punishment to the offender. It is,
therefore
, necessary to go through the perpetrator's evil-deeds reports
thoroughly
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
give
a right decision.
11Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
12Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes

IELTS essay Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. v. 2

Essay
  American English
6 paragraphs
285 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts