Trump asked his fans to gather
in front of the capitol. As soon as congress began, American justice seekers, succeeded to break into this site, and messing everything up, by forcing the seciurity, and the anti-riot police.
Capitol met its second attack. Representatives hide in a safe place, waiting for people to go. Americans sat behind the desk of their enemies, the Democrats, and placed letters with the title
"WE WON'T GIVE UP ". Seciurity agents were even getting ready for openning fire, in case the demonstrators fired. More than 70 people arrested, and 5 people died.
After a lot of controversy, Twitter banned Donald Trump's account, according to one of its rules talking about inviting people to anger.
Now some say Twitter did the right thing, because Trump violated Twitter rules, but some others say it isn't right, because
Trump didn't invited people to violence.
I'm now gonna look into this legally, and present you the final result.
The short answer is NO; it is COMPLETELY WRONG. I don't want to talk about whether president Trump asked his supporters to attack capitol or no, because it's not our case; but also I wanna talk about his freedom of expression. Twitter wasn't allowed to disobey this rule, because Twitter is a social
media.
Some people say Twitter is a non-governmental organization, and has this permission to violate the US constitution. I have
to deny this too; because as I said earlier, Twitter is a SOCIAL MEDIA, and it means that it's related to all of the people living all around the world; so it has to obey its country constitution, America.
Let me reach out to you by
giving an example: think I've established a non-governmental
band, aiming to kill people.
Now tell me; is it right to create
this band? If no why? If yes why? Let me answer this. No, it's wrong; it's obvious that'a wrong. That's because killing people is not allowed in any country. So my
band has to be closed, and I can't
say because my band isn't governmental, so I can disobey rules.
Or let me try another example: I constitute a market, and at the top of its enterance, write " Blacks enterance is not allowed"
Now what do you think of this?
Would you say because it's not a governmental market, its boss can do everything in it! ?
No; you won't. That's because it
is a public market, and people wanna use it; so this market has to obey that country constitution.
If it was my house, it would be correct; because that is mine, and it's not public; so I decide who enters, and who doesn't.
To sum up, Twitter is public, so
it has to obey governmental rules, even if it's not
governmental. There is no reason
why Twitter can't obey the US rules, because it's not a governmental media; so I think it's stupid to say this. If Twitter has to obey the United States rules, so it doesn't have the right to defy freedom of expression, and bann everyone who speaks. Twitter has to admire all of the beliefs; even about the most violent or incoherent topics.
Trump asked his fans to gather
in
front of the capitol. As
soon
as congress began, American justice seekers, succeeded to break into this site, and messing everything up, by forcing the
seciurity
, and the anti-riot police.
Capitol met its second attack. Representatives
hide
in a safe place, waiting for
people
to go. Americans sat behind the desk of their enemies, the Democrats, and placed letters with the
title
"
WE WON'T GIVE UP
"
.
Seciurity
agents were even getting ready for
openning
fire, in case the demonstrators fired. More than 70
people
arrested, and 5
people
died
.
After
a lot of
controversy, Twitter banned Donald Trump's account, according to one of its
rules
talking about inviting
people
to anger.
Now
some
say Twitter did the
right
thing,
because
Trump violated Twitter
rules
,
but
some
others say it isn't
right
,
because
Trump didn't
invited
people
to violence.
I'm
now
gonna look into this
legally
, and present you the final result.
The short answer is NO; it is COMPLETELY
WRONG
. I don't want to talk about whether president Trump asked his supporters to attack capitol or no,
because
it's
not our case;
but
also
I wanna talk about his freedom of expression. Twitter wasn't
allowed
to disobey this
rule
,
because
Twitter is a
social
media
.
Some
people
say Twitter is a non-governmental organization, and has this permission to violate the
US constitution
. I have
to deny this too;
because
as I said earlier, Twitter is a SOCIAL MEDIA, and it means that
it's
related to
all of the
people
living all around the world;
so
it
has to
obey
its country constitution, America.
Let
me reach out to you by
giving an example:
think
I've established a non-governmental
band
, aiming to kill
people
.
Now
tell
me; is it
right
to create
this band? If no why? If yes why?
Let
me answer this. No,
it's
wrong
;
it's
obvious that'a
wrong
. That's
because
killing
people
is not
allowed
in any country.
So
my
band
has to
be closed
, and I can't
say
because
my band isn't
governmental
,
so
I can disobey
rules
.
Or
let
me try another example: I constitute a
market
, and at the top of its
enterance
, write
"
Blacks
enterance
is not
allowed
"
Now
what do you
think
of this?
Would you say
because
it's
not a
governmental
market
, its boss can do everything in it! ?
No; you won't. That's
because
it
is a public
market
, and
people
wanna
use
it;
so
this
market
has to
obey
that country constitution.
If it was my
house
, it would be correct;
because
that is
mine, and
it's
not public;
so
I decide who enters, and who doesn't.
To sum up, Twitter is public,
so
it
has to
obey
governmental
rules
, even if
it's
not
governmental
. There is no reason
why Twitter can't
obey
the US
rules
,
because
it's
not a
governmental
media;
so
I
think
it's
stupid to say this. If Twitter
has to
obey
the United States
rules
,
so
it doesn't have the
right
to defy freedom of expression, and
bann
everyone who speaks. Twitter
has to
admire
all of the
beliefs; even about the most violent or incoherent topics.