Will spending money on salaries of university professors enhance the quality of education? Although some people may give a negative answer on the question, I strongly support it because of the reasons which will be discussed in details below.
Firstly, spending money on professors will attract more professionals in universities. Today some tertiary institutions are understaffed because the size of educators’ salaries makes working in the university unattractive for many well-prepared professors; therefore, the quality of education seems to be low. However, if the policy is implemented, many professors will apply for a job. This change will let universities to pick the best educators with lots of experience and expertise; a competition among professors may indeed benefit universities, students via increasing an overall quality of higher education.
Secondly, professors who are well-paid will be able to devote more time to their students. Today many professors who are employed by universities rarely teach students because mostly they involved in researches which will attract money to their studies. In other words, they have to keep doing their scientific studies in order to get enough money for a comfortable life. However, if the system of education starts to allocate money on professors' salaries, the educators will learn that they are wanted to share their expertise and knowledge with their listeners because financial stimuli is a good motivator for people and by steering flow of money we may alter professors’ priorities. This step leads to improvement of the quality of education inasmuch as students, who are taught by well-known and famous scientists who made a contribution in their scientific fields, will have access to professors’ knowledge, prospect on subject. Thus we may expect skyrocketing of the quality of tertiary education.
Admittedly, there are some reasons which may allow a person who thinks that in order to improve the quality of education universities ought not to spend money of institutions’ staff salaries. Chiefly, the person may aver that buying new equipment for labs, books for libraries and computers is a better way to improve the quality of tertiary education. However, I still affirm that distributing money on professors’ salaries is more reasonable step because even the best lab equipment in the world and most recent textbooks will not magically improve students' performance on their own. In fact, without well-motivated and well-taught professors with lots of expertise those new items will be useless pile of high tech stuff. However, professors who satisfied with their income and who made enough money for having a comfortable life may improve the level of education enormously.
To wrap up, professors are valuable asset; this work position must be well-paid in order to attract many of candidates from whom the institution may pick the best ones. Additionally to it, if a professor knows that he is paid for teaching, he will spend more time on teaching as well.
Will spending
money
on
salaries
of
university
professors
enhance the
quality
of
education
? Although
some
people
may give a
negative
answer on the question, I
strongly
support it
because
of the reasons which will
be discussed
in
details
below.
Firstly
, spending
money
on
professors
will attract more professionals in
universities
.
Today
some
tertiary institutions
are understaffed
because
the size of educators’
salaries
makes
working in the
university
unattractive for
many
well-prepared
professors
;
therefore
, the
quality
of
education
seems to be low.
However
, if the policy
is implemented
,
many
professors
will apply for a job. This
change
will
let
universities
to pick the best educators with lots of experience and expertise; a competition among
professors
may
indeed
benefit
universities
,
students
via increasing an
overall
quality
of higher education.
Secondly
,
professors
who
are well-paid will be able to devote more time to their
students
.
Today
many
professors
who
are employed
by
universities
rarely teach
students
because
mostly
they involved in researches which will attract
money
to their studies.
In other words
, they
have to
keep
doing their scientific studies in order to
get
enough
money
for a comfortable life.
However
, if the system of
education
starts
to allocate
money
on
professors&
#039;
salaries
, the educators will learn that they
are wanted
to share their expertise and knowledge with their listeners
because
financial stimuli is a
good
motivator for
people
and by steering flow of
money
we may alter
professors’
priorities. This step leads to improvement of the
quality
of
education
inasmuch as
students
,
who
are taught
by well-known and
famous
scientists
who
made a contribution in their scientific fields, will have access to
professors’
knowledge, prospect on subject.
Thus
we may
expect
skyrocketing of the
quality
of tertiary education.
Admittedly
, there are
some
reasons which may
allow
a person
who
thinks
that in order to
improve
the
quality
of
education
universities
ought not to spend
money
of institutions’ staff
salaries
.
Chiefly
, the person may aver that buying new equipment for labs, books for libraries and computers is a better way to
improve
the
quality
of tertiary
education
.
However
, I
still
affirm that distributing
money
on
professors’
salaries
is more reasonable step
because
even the best lab equipment in the world and most recent textbooks will not
magically
improve
students&
#039; performance on their
own
. In fact, without well-motivated and well-taught
professors
with lots of expertise those new items will be useless pile of high tech stuff.
However
,
professors
who
satisfied with their income and
who
made
enough
money
for having a comfortable life may
improve
the level of
education
enormously
.
To wrap up,
professors
are valuable asset; this work position
must
be well-paid in order to attract
many
of candidates from whom the institution may pick the best ones.
Additionally
to it, if a
professor
knows that he
is paid
for teaching, he will spend more time on teaching
as well
.