Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people

TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 56kMQ
The article and the lecture both discuss advantage and disadvantages of assembling a group of people to work on a project as a team. The article states that group process provides several advantages, and probably is the best way an organization uses to approach new projects. The author provides three reasons for support. However, the professor disagrees with the reading and refutes each of the author's reason. First, the reading states that gathering people to work as a team provides more diversity of people who have expertise, skills, and knowledge compare with working individually. The professor refutes this point by stating that after observed a group process in one company, the result shows that not everybody participates in a group working. Moreover, if a team did a great job, some members who did not contribute much would benefit from the recognition as well as the others who work hard. Second, the article claims that working as a team has more people and resources involves in projects. Therefore, new projects can be done faster than working individually. Moreover, a group process provides more creative solutions to problems because people share the responsibility for making a decision and tend to make a risky decision that individual might not attempt to dose. However, the professor contends that working as a team can take a longer time to finish projects because it takes time for meetings before they can find the final consensus and make a group decision. Third, the reading claims that members of the team get benefit from a group process. The author explains that Influential members will be willing to follow the work created by other members. Also, an individual member has much chance to contribute to the group and will be well recognized. This is because a team's overall results can have a great impact than working alone. The professor disagrees with this point. He says that not everyone's voice are heard in a group process. There were some influential people in a group tend to convince the team to make decisions basted on their ideas and everyone most likely follow these people ideas and ignore others who disagree with. However, when the project failed, the negative reputation was placed on every member of a group, not individual ones.
The article and the lecture both discuss advantage and disadvantages of assembling a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
on a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
project
as a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
. The article states that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
process
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
provides
several advantages, and
probably
is the best way an organization
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
uses
to approach new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
projects
.
Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
The
author
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
provides
three reasons for support.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
disagrees with the reading and refutes each of the author's reason.

First
, the reading states that gathering
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
as a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
provides
more diversity of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
have expertise,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
, and knowledge compare with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
individually
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
refutes this point by stating that after observed a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
process
in one
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
, the result
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
that not everybody participates in a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
.
Moreover
, if a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
did a great job,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
members
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
did not contribute much would benefit from the recognition
as well
as the others
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
hard
.

Second, the article claims that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
as a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
has more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
and resources involves in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
projects
.
Therefore
, new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
projects
can
be done
faster than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
individually
.
Moreover
, a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
process
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
provides
more creative solutions to problems
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
share the responsibility for making a decision and tend to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
a risky decision that individual might not attempt to dose.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
contends that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
as a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
can take a longer time to finish
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
projects
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it takes time for meetings
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
they can find the final consensus and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
decision.

Third, the reading claims that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
members
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
benefit from a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
process
. The author
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explains
that Influential
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
members
will be willing to follow the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
created by other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
members
.
Also
, an individual
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
has much chance to contribute to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
and will be well recognized. This is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
a team's
overall
results can have a great impact than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
alone. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
disagrees with this point. He says that not everyone's voice
are heard
in a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
process
. There were
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
influential
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
tend to convince the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
decisions basted on their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ideas
and everyone most likely follow these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ideas
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ignore
others
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
disagree with.
However
, when the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
project
failed, the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
reputation
was placed
on every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
, not individual ones.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
379 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people