Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri

TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri e5wxx
The article states that offering employees to work a four-day workweek or four-fifths would benefit individual companies as well as whole economic and employees who decided to take the option, and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor disagrees with the author's points. He explains that the four-fifths policy will not benefit to anyone and refutes each of the author's reasons. First, the reading states that individual companies would make more benefit out of offering employees to work four-fifth. Employees who work four days per week will have time to get more rest. As a result, they would make fewer cost errors in their work than employees who work five days per week. The professor refutes this point by stating that hiring more employees would increase company's cost. Adding new workers requires a company to invest money into providing training and medical benefits. Although, having more employees requires a company to expand office space and buy more computers. These additional cost would reduce the company profits. Second, the article claims that offering employees to work four-fifths would have an impact on reducing the employment rate. However, the professor contends that hiring more worker is costly. Therefore, a company could ask employees to work overtime or increase expectation of having four-day work employee finish work what they did in five days previously. As a result, no additional jobs will be created. Third, the reading avers that the option of working four-fifths would be beneficial for individual emplyees regarding improving a quality of life. Employees who are working four days a week would have more extra time to spend with their family and enjoying themselves. The professor opposes this point by explaining that working four-fifths is risky, and could end up reducing a quality of life in term of decreasing job stability and opportunity to advance in careers. Moreover, employees who choose to work four days a week tend to be the first to lose their jobs and be passed over for promotions.
The article states that offering
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
a four-day workweek or four-fifths would
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
benefit
individual
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
as well
as whole economic and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
decided to take the option, and provides three reasons for support.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
disagrees with the author's points. He
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explains
that the four-fifths policy will not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
benefit
to anyone and refutes each of the author's reasons.

First
, the reading states that individual
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
benefit
out of offering
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
four-fifth.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Employees
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
four days per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
will have time to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
more rest.
As a result
, they would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
fewer cost errors in their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
five days per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
refutes this point by stating that hiring more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
would increase
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
's cost. Adding new workers requires a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
to invest money into providing training and medical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
benefits
. Although, having more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
requires a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
to expand office space and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
buy
more computers. These additional cost would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
profits.

Second, the article claims that offering
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
four-fifths would have an impact on reducing the employment rate.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
contends that hiring
Use only "worker" (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
more worker
is costly.
Therefore
, a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
could ask
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
overtime or increase expectation of having four-day
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employee
finish
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
what they did in five days previously.
As a result
, no additional jobs will
be created
.

Third, the reading avers that the option of working four-fifths would be beneficial for individual
Possible spelling mistake found.
emplyees
regarding improving a quality of life.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Employees
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are working four days a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
would have more extra time to spend with their family and enjoying themselves. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
opposes this point by explaining that working four-fifths is risky, and could
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
up reducing a quality of life in term of decreasing job stability and opportunity to advance in careers.
Moreover
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
choose to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
four days a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
tend to be the
first
to lose their jobs and
be passed
over for promotions.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
332 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri