The reading and lecture are both about the Torreya taxifolia. The author is of the reading feels that experts are considering three ways to address the decline of Torreya; however, the lecturer challenges the claim made by the author. He is of the opinion that such three ways are not to be succeeded. The lecturer cast doubt on the main point made in the reading by providing three reasons.
To begin with, the author argues that the first option is to reestablish Torreya in the same location in which it thrived for thousands of years. he feels that Torreya used to be found in abundance in the northern part of Florida; nevertheless, this argument is challenged by the lecturer. She is of the opinion that the temperature of Florida is increases as compare to earlier climate report because it is highly affected by global warming. The vast areas of Florida become drier so it is not possible to reestablish Torreya in Florida as Torreya required cold areas.
Secondly, the reading states that the second option for the preservation of Torreya is to move Torreya to an entirely different location, especially far from its Florida microclimate; nonetheless, the lecturer rebut this by mentioning the example of the black locust tree. human changed the location of black locust tree with a purpose of preservation of tree; though the growth of black locust tree had increased, howbeit it killed the other species of trees and plants.
Finally, the author posits that the third option is to preserve Torreya in research centres; on the other hand, the lecturer feels that preservation in the research centre is not ideal. she feels that research is not even capable to give facility or docile the large and diverse population of Torreya.
The
reading
and lecture are both about the
Torreya
taxifolia
. The
author
is of the
reading
feels
that experts are considering three ways to address the decline of
Torreya
;
however
, the
lecturer
challenges the claim made by the
author
. He is of the opinion that such three ways are not to
be succeeded
. The
lecturer
cast doubt on the main point made in the
reading
by providing three reasons.
To
begin
with, the
author
argues that the
first
option is to reestablish
Torreya
in the same location in which it thrived for thousands of years.
he
feels
that
Torreya
used
to
be found
in abundance in the northern part of Florida;
nevertheless
, this argument
is challenged
by the
lecturer
. She is of the opinion that the temperature of Florida is increases as compare to earlier climate report
because
it is
highly
affected
by global warming. The vast areas of Florida become drier
so
it is not possible to reestablish
Torreya
in Florida as
Torreya
required
cold
areas.
Secondly
, the
reading
states that the second option for the preservation of
Torreya
is to
move
Torreya
to an
entirely
different
location,
especially
far from its Florida microclimate; nonetheless, the
lecturer
rebut this by mentioning the example of the black locust
tree
.
human
changed
the location of black locust
tree
with a purpose of preservation of
tree
; though the growth of black locust
tree
had increased, howbeit it killed the other species of
trees
and plants.
Finally
, the
author
posits that the third option is to preserve
Torreya
in research
centres
;
on the other hand
, the
lecturer
feels
that preservation in the research
centre
is not ideal.
she
feels
that research is not even capable to give facility or docile the large and diverse population of
Torreya
.