birds problem with the glasses of the buildings which they crash all the time

The passage and the talk both discuss the birds' problem with the glasses of the buildings which they crash all the time. The writer contends that there is some solutions that can be utilized to save birds from window crashing. The lecturer, however, refutes the author's assessments. He demonstrates three reasons to cast doubt on the claims made in the reading. The first allegation of the script against which the orator argues is that architectures can employ one-way glasses in the buildings, so people will see the outside but birds see a reflection and not the inside of the buildings and they will not try to pass. In contrast, the speaker finds this idea debatable. He bolsters his opinion by stating that the one-way glasses reflect like a mirror and they are as bad as the regular glasses. He notes that for example, birds will see the reflection of the sky or a tree and they fly right into them. Second, according to the text, colorful stripes on the windows will help the birds to notice that it is not open and people also would see the other side. Although, the professor highlights the fact that birds see the openings as the open holes to get through which results in crashing again. Moreover, he says that if they make the strips thicker to make the holes extremely small so birds would not try to fly through, the house will be dark. Lastly, the lecture contradicts this fallacy of the passage that magnetic field is a effective tool to prevent birds to fly into the glasses, saying that birds use this ability only in long distance trips. For instance, if birds travel from a cold country to a warmer one, they use their built-in magnetic compass to find the way. But, for short distances they only use their eyes and brightness of the light to navigate. Therefore, magnetic fields would not be a proper method to prevent birds from crashing to the windows.