The argument claims that Saluda Natural Spring Water is an essential investment in good health because, according laboratory studies, it contains necessary for health minerals had no bacteria and residents of the small town Saluda, where the water is sold, are not so frequently hospitalized as the national average. This conclusion, based solely on two pieces of evidence, is doubtful as it does not provide any clear information. Hence, the argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.
First of all, the argument readily assumes that there were only laboratory studies, but there is no information about the research of this water in real conditions. As most people know, it is often differences between tests in laboratories and outside them due to the fact that it is impossible to consider all factors. In addition, the argument mentions containing several of the minerals necessary for good health, but it is also not stated what are they. What minerals are essential for good health? There is no objective criteria.
Secondly, the argument makes an assumption that resident of small time have a good health due to the fact that in their habitat Saluda Natural Spring Water is bottled. The author fails to mention that there a lot of other factors which can influence people's health such as a lifestyle and food preferences. Also the less frequenters of hospitalization may be connected with the average age of residents in Saluda.
Thirdly, the argument could have been much clearer if it provided the information on any national research which could be found in trust scientist's magazines as all real and essential studies scientist like to publish in such magazines.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to provide more evidence. Supporting examples would further substantiate the author's view. Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.
The
argument
claims that
Saluda
Natural Spring
Water
is an essential investment in
good
health
because
, according laboratory studies, it contains necessary for
health
minerals had no bacteria and residents of the
small
town
Saluda
, where the
water
is sold
, are not
so
frequently
hospitalized as the national average. This conclusion, based
solely
on two pieces of evidence, is doubtful as it does not provide any
clear
information
.
Hence
, the
argument
is unconvincing and has several flaws.
First of all
, the
argument
readily
assumes that there were
only
laboratory studies,
but
there is no
information
about the research of this
water
in real conditions. As most
people
know, it is
often
differences between
tests
in laboratories and outside them due to the fact that it is impossible to consider all factors.
In addition
, the
argument
mentions containing several of the minerals necessary for
good
health
,
but
it is
also
not stated what are they. What minerals are essential for
good
health
? There is no objective criteria.
Secondly
, the
argument
makes
an assumption that resident of
small time
have a
good
health
due to the fact that in their habitat
Saluda
Natural Spring
Water
is bottled
. The author fails to mention that there
a lot of
other factors which can influence
people
's
health
such as a lifestyle and food preferences.
Also
the
less
frequenters of hospitalization may
be connected
with the average age of residents in
Saluda
.
Thirdly
, the
argument
could have been much clearer if it provided the
information
on any national research which could
be found
in trust scientist's magazines as all real and essential
studies
scientist like to publish in such magazines.
In conclusion
, the
argument
is flawed
for the above-mentioned reasons and is
therefore
unconvincing. To strengthen the
argument
the author would
have to
provide more evidence. Supporting examples would
further
substantiate the author's view. Without this
information
, the
argument
remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.