The reading and the lecture are both about the theories related to the discovery of America by Vikings. The author of the reading feels that last evidences suggest that Columbus did not discover America, and Vikings are the first people who inhabited in North America’s soil. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that most of these claims are partial, and these theories have not any scientific or archaeological background.
To begin with, the author argues that the Vikings reached North America with the start point from settlements in Greenland. The article mentions that when the Vikings reached the North American soil, they discovered a great, amazing place with wild grapes and called it Vinland. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that there is not actual evidence that Vinland is the same with Newfoundland. Additionally, he says that there are also wild grapes grow in Vikings’ homeland, so that is why they claim Newfoundland as the Vinland.
Secondly, the writer suggests that remains of nine Viking houses were found by Norwegian archaeologists in North America. In the article, it is said that these houses were similar to Norse homes, which are made of wooden frames covered with sod, just like homes in Greenland way before. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that this claim made by only 2 Norwegian archaeologists. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that this claim is biased, and based on patriotism, because these archaeologists are from Norway.
Finally, the author posits that existence of Vikings in North America has been proven by the runestones, which are covered with runic inscriptions. Moreover, it is also stated that these runic alphabets were used in Scandinavia with almost same bedrocks. In contrast, the lecturer is of the opinion that these runestones authenticity is still unknown. He notes that these claims can not be the evidence for Vikings’ advent to the North America before Columbus.
The reading and the lecture are both about the theories related to the discovery of America by Vikings. The
author
of the reading feels that last evidences suggest that Columbus did not discover America, and Vikings are the
first
people
who inhabited in
North
America’s soil.
The
lecturer
challenges the
claims
made by the
author
. He is of the opinion that most of these
claims
are partial, and these theories have not any scientific or archaeological background.
To
begin
with, the
author
argues that the Vikings reached
North
America with the
start
point from settlements in Greenland. The article mentions that when the Vikings reached the
North
American soil, they discovered a great, amazing place with wild grapes and called it
Vinland
. This specific argument
is challenged
by the
lecturer
. He
claims
that there is not actual evidence that
Vinland
is the same with Newfoundland.
Additionally
, he says that there are
also
wild grapes grow in Vikings’ homeland,
so
that is
why they
claim
Newfoundland as the
Vinland
.
Secondly
, the writer suggests that remains of nine Viking
houses
were found
by Norwegian archaeologists in
North
America. In the article, it
is said
that these
houses
were similar to Norse homes, which
are made
of wooden frames covered with sod,
just
like homes in Greenland way
before
. The
lecturer
,
however
, rebuts this by mentioning that this
claim
made by
only
2 Norwegian archaeologists. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that this
claim
is biased
, and based on patriotism,
because
these archaeologists are from Norway.
Finally
, the
author
posits that existence of Vikings in
North
America has
been proven
by the
runestones
, which
are covered
with runic inscriptions.
Moreover
, it is
also
stated that these runic alphabets were
used
in Scandinavia with almost same bedrocks.
In contrast
, the
lecturer
is of the opinion that these
runestones
authenticity is
still
unknown. He notes that these
claims
can not be the evidence for Vikings’ advent to the
North
America
before
Columbus.