Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

To what extent is current animal testing essential for the treatment of patients who are suffering from cancer?

To what extent is current animal testing essential for the treatment of patients who are suffering from cancer? mKRA
Animal testing is one of the most worldwide scientific methods of an experiment to find cancer treatment for patients by investigating different kinds of drugs. An understanding of the underlying processes underpinning malignancy and discovering better strategies for cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment can be achieved through high requirements of animal care for high-quality cancer studies (Workman et al. , 2010). Due to the fact that approximately 1 in 6 deaths caused by cancer, this kind of disease is considered to be the second leading reason for worldwide death (WHO, 2018). Due to the genomic, proteomic and metabolic profiles along with their organic mechanism and behavior, mice and rats remain the most suitable laboratory animals (Garattini & Grignaschi, 2017). However, 85% of preclinical studies for new drugs tested on animals fail (Ledford, 2011 as cited in Mak et al. , 2014). Even though the main reasons for these failures are logistical and research design problems, this occurs because of molecular mechanisms (exploration by genetic and biochemical testing) of the investigational drugs (Thomas, 2012 as cited in Mak et al. , 2014). Consequently, this research will focus on addressing the achievements and failures of animal testing against cancer in recent investigations. Firstly, the paper will consider whether cancer treatment for animals is suitable for humans. Secondly, testing a large number of various medical drugs on animals will be discussed. Finally, there will be a focus on comparing the benefits and drawbacks of animal testing experiments worldwide. Moreover, if the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, this research paper will address alternatives to using animals. The findings of this essay analyze the effectiveness of animal testing contribution by using different research results regarding recent investigations in cancer treatments than other methods of experiments in developed countries. Despite some similarities between animals and humans, usage of animals in preclinical trials, it will be argued that animal testing is not the optimum way of finding cancer treatments. Its use is not justified owing to ethical considerations, non-compliance of animal welfare, a huge amount of drug failures and reliability issues.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is one of the most worldwide scientific methods of an experiment to find
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cancer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
treatment
for patients by investigating
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
kinds of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
drugs
. An understanding of the underlying processes underpinning malignancy and discovering better strategies for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cancer
prevention, diagnosis and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
treatment
can
be achieved
through high requirements of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
care for high-quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cancer
studies (Workman et al.
Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
,
2010). Due to the fact that approximately 1 in 6 deaths caused by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cancer
, this kind of disease
is considered
to be the second leading reason for worldwide death (WHO, 2018). Due to the genomic,
Possible spelling mistake found.
proteomic
and metabolic profiles along with their organic mechanism and behavior, mice and rats remain the most suitable laboratory
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
(
Possible spelling mistake found.
Garattini
&
Possible spelling mistake found.
Grignaschi
, 2017).
However
, 85% of preclinical studies for new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
drugs
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
fail (
Possible spelling mistake found.
Ledford
, 2011 as cited in
Possible spelling mistake found.
Mak
et al.
Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
,
2014).
Even though
the main reasons for these failures are logistical and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
design problems, this occurs
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of molecular mechanisms (exploration by genetic and biochemical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing)
of the investigational
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
drugs
(Thomas, 2012 as cited in
Possible spelling mistake found.
Mak
et al.
Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
,
2014).
Consequently
, this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
will focus on addressing the achievements and failures of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
against
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cancer
in recent investigations.
Firstly
, the paper will consider whether
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cancer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
treatment
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
is suitable for humans.
Secondly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use "many" or "numerous"
a large number of
various medical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
drugs
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
will
be discussed
.
Finally
, there will be a focus on comparing the benefits and drawbacks of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
experiments worldwide.
Moreover
, if the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
paper will address alternatives to using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. The findings of this essay analyze the effectiveness of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
contribution by using
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
results regarding recent investigations in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cancer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
treatments
than other methods of experiments in
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
developed countries
. Despite
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
similarities between
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
and humans, usage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
in preclinical trials, it will
be argued
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is not the optimum way of finding
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cancer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
treatments
. Its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
is not justified owing to ethical considerations, non-compliance of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
welfare, a huge amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
drug
failures and reliability issues.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay To what extent is current animal testing essential for the treatment of patients who are suffering from cancer?

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
343 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • To what extent is current animal testing essential for the treatment of patients who are suffering from cancer?