Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Throughout the history, male leaders always lead us to violence and conflict. If a society is governed by female leaders it will be more peaceful. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that male politicians are responsible for aggression and constant tensions between countries and if women were elevated into leadership roles, we would have a more peaceful society. However, I disagree with this view. On the one hand, I acknowledge that many fierce wars, attended with painful consequences, have occurred under male leadership. Those who advocate for this view generally contended that wars stem from the nature of men, who are supposedly always aggressive and bad-tempered. First World War and Second World War, for example, caused millions of casualties and leaders like Adolf Hitler are criticized for having created blood wars. However, I would argue that those decisions are definitely not a product of personality traits of a leader, but a reflection of perspectives of various people and groups involved. It is no doubt clear that the rise of Adolf Hitler and his ambitions of domination in Europe reflected more of a common desire of many Germans and other politicians than his own interest. On the other hand, it is absurd to say that feminine leadership model will make the world more peaceful. Firstly, history shows that female leaders could also make bellicose decisions that men do in the face of oppressive conditions and provocative actions. For instance, having been suffering under cruel rules of Chinese governors, Trung Trac who is a national hero of Vietnam established a kingdom as the Queen and led a rebellion against Chinese invasions. Another example is that Victoria, after having become Queen of the United Kingdom, also invaded India, China, and many countries in close succession. Secondly, in the future, decisions between war and peace will depend not on gender, but how leaders combine soft- and hard-power skills to produce smart strategies. This means that it would be completely wrong to inject a man in favour of a woman when both of them possess the ability to make such decisions. In conclusion, I strongly believe that women do not hold the key to world peace, what we need is government leaders who could implement feasible policies to cease hostilities
Some
people
argue that male politicians are responsible for aggression and constant tensions between countries and if women
were elevated
into leadership roles, we would have a more peaceful society.
However
, I disagree with this view.

On the one hand, I acknowledge that
many
fierce
wars
, attended with painful consequences, have occurred under male leadership. Those
who
advocate for this view
generally
contended that
wars
stem from the nature of
men
,
who
are
supposedly
always aggressive and
bad
-tempered.
First
World
War
and Second
World
War
,
for example
, caused millions of casualties and
leaders
like Adolf Hitler
are criticized
for having created blood
wars
.
However
, I would argue that those decisions are definitely not a product of personality traits of a
leader
,
but
a reflection of perspectives of various
people
and groups involved. It is no doubt
clear
that the rise of Adolf Hitler and his ambitions of domination in Europe reflected more of a common desire of
many
Germans and other politicians than his
own
interest.

On the other hand
, it is absurd to say that feminine leadership model will
make
the
world
more peaceful.
Firstly
, history
shows
that female
leaders
could
also
make
bellicose decisions that
men
do in the face of oppressive conditions and provocative actions.
For instance
, having been suffering under cruel
rules
of Chinese governors,
Trung
Trac
who
is a national hero of Vietnam established a kingdom as the Queen and led a rebellion against Chinese invasions. Another example is that Victoria, after having become Queen of the United Kingdom,
also
invaded India, China, and
many
countries in close succession.
Secondly
, in the future, decisions between
war
and peace will depend not on gender,
but
how
leaders
combine soft- and
hard
-power
skills
to produce smart strategies. This means that it would be completely
wrong
to inject a
man
in
favour
of a woman when both of them possess the ability to
make
such decisions.

In conclusion
, I
strongly
believe that women do not hold the key to
world
peace, what we need is
government
leaders
who
could implement feasible policies to cease hostilities
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Throughout the history, male leaders always lead us to violence and conflict. If a society is governed by female leaders it will be more peaceful.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
346 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts