Throughout the history, a range of sports events are organized several locations for invigorating economy and turning attention of the public onto sports. People's approach about hosting of their countries for sport organizations are debated. There are strong views on both sides, which I will discuss.
Firstly, those who oppose to be host of their hometown for international events, as well as sports events, due to the fact that government must makes a massive public investment. The government must build an area for events, and procure security of all guests and citizens, so that it may be a financial burden. In their opinion, these funds should be spent to eliminate essential issues. Secondly, international events cause a overcrowding which is a significant problem like traffic congestion for citizens, especially commuters. This overcrowding may also attrack terror organisations' attention, which wreaks a severe political issue. Terror act which happened in Brazil during international footbal events is a good example for this argument.
Another point is about a positive side of hosting that many of the local community consent to participate their countries in international events. For organization event new buildings are constructed, and various of places in city are redesigned. Thus, it helps to alter city infrastructure, and also offer employment oppurtunities. In addition, international events are gain in plethora of turists for hosting country and assist in developing turism industry. Government presents to turists the centrepiece of the city, and it may help change city into one of the turist attraction cities. In future, government budget will be supported by turism industry, and can earn more income than they spend. For instance, increasing number of turists to visit Azerbaijan where plays host for UEFA a few years ago affirms that hosting for internatioan sports game are beneficial to develop turism industry, especially for third world countries.
In conclusion, the advantages of hosting like improving city infrastructure and turism industry outweight the views of opponents about wasting government budget and overcrowding.
Throughout the history, a range of
sports
events
are organized
several locations for invigorating economy and turning attention of the public onto
sports
.
People
's approach about
hosting
of their countries for
sport
organizations
are debated
. There are strong views on both sides, which I will discuss.
Firstly
, those who oppose to be
host
of their hometown for
international
events
,
as well
as
sports
events
, due to the fact that
government
must
makes
a massive public investment. The
government
must
build an area for
events
, and procure security of all guests and citizens,
so
that it may be a financial burden. In their opinion, these funds should
be spent
to eliminate essential issues.
Secondly
,
international
events
cause
a
overcrowding which is a significant problem like traffic congestion for citizens,
especially
commuters. This overcrowding may
also
attrack
terror
organisations
' attention, which wreaks a severe political issue. Terror act which happened in Brazil during
international
footbal
events
is a
good
example for this argument.
Another point is about a
positive
side of
hosting
that
many
of the local community consent to participate their countries in
international
events
. For organization
event
new buildings
are constructed
, and various of places in city
are redesigned
.
Thus
, it
helps
to alter city infrastructure, and
also
offer employment
oppurtunities
.
In addition
,
international
events
are gain in plethora of
turists
for
hosting
country and assist in developing
turism
industry
.
Government
presents to
turists
the
centrepiece
of the city, and it may
help
change
city into one of the
turist
attraction
cities
.
In future
,
government
budget will
be supported
by
turism
industry
, and can earn more income than they spend.
For instance
, increasing number of
turists
to visit Azerbaijan where plays host for UEFA a few years ago affirms that
hosting
for
internatioan
sports
game are beneficial to develop
turism
industry
,
especially
for third world countries.
In conclusion
, the advantages of
hosting
like improving city infrastructure and
turism
industry
outweight
the views of opponents about wasting
government
budget and overcrowding.