Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Three days at home with longer hours of work better than five days at work.

Three days at home with longer hours of work better than five days at work. QLnMP
Job, as we all know, for the majority of people, plays a dominant role in their life. Due to the paramount importance of the job, efforts for elevating its effectiveness have always been among the top priorities of sociologists. In this regard, many people believe that having a job that required a person to do her or his job three days a week for long hours is far better than having a job that a person has to work for five days a week. Contrary to common belief, I believe that working for five days a week provides numerous advantages like better consistency and leisure time. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint. The first reason that makes me hold the belief that having five days for working is favorable is related to the job consistency aspect. Undoubtedly, for achieving success in every task, it is necessary to do it continually. Without a doubt, one noticeable result of consistency is the focus. A concentrated employee is far more acceptable for most of the companies. Although many critics may challenge this opinion and debate that employees who have some days for themselves in a week have much more time for themselves, employees who experience both circumstances- being at work for longer hours or more days- show their support toward the latter. As well as, based on statistics, this method for working brings better concentrate on work processes both for company and employees. A person knows better about how his work process and can manage it properly if every day being at work. Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is experiencing much more qualified spare time. Whenever people have a balanced time for work, they can revive themselves better in their free time. Moreover, scientifically speaking, extra leisure time brings tediousness for people. In other words, having three days at home is considered as exceeding holidays that make the work efficiency not only worsen but also cause bored feelings in employees` temper. In other words, employees can enjoy their hobby better and make their mind fresher in a balanced situation. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, I was hired in an organization that had a rule. Every employee had to be at work for three days a week and then had the same days as off work. Surprisingly, despite the fact that I had expected to enjoy my free time when I was at work, I wanted it became over sooner, and when I was at home, I was upset because of the extra time I had. What would have happened if I had had another system for my job? I surely believe that I could be more energetic and sufficient. To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that neither extra free time nor excessive working time not influential for a person`s efficiency.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Job
, as we all know, for the majority of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
, plays a dominant role in their life. Due to the paramount importance of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
, efforts for elevating its effectiveness have always been among the top priorities of sociologists. In this regard,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
having
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
that required a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
to do her or his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
three days a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
for long hours is far
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
having
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
that a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
has to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
for five days a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
. Contrary to common belief, I believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
for five days a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
provides numerous advantages like
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
consistency and leisure
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.

The
first
reason that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
me hold the belief that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
having
five days for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
is favorable
is related
to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
consistency aspect.
Undoubtedly
, for achieving success in every task, it is necessary to do it
continually
. Without a doubt, one noticeable result of consistency is the focus. A concentrated
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employee
is far more acceptable for most of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
. Although
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
critics may challenge this opinion and debate that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
who have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
days for themselves in a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
have much more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
for themselves,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
who experience both circumstances- being at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
for longer hours or more days-
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
their support toward the latter.
As well
as, based on statistics, this method for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
brings
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
concentrate on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
processes both for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
. A
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
knows
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
about how his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
process and can manage it
properly
if every day being at work.

Another
equally
noteworthy reason to bear in mind is experiencing much more qualified spare
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
. Whenever
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
have a balanced
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
, they can revive themselves
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
in their free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
.
Moreover
,
scientifically
speaking, extra leisure
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
brings tediousness for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
.
In other words
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
having
three days at home
is considered
as exceeding holidays that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
efficiency not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
worsen
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
cause bored feelings in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees`
temper.
In other words
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
can enjoy their hobby
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
their mind fresher in a balanced situation. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, I
was hired
in an organization that had a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rule
. Every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employee
had to be at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
for three days a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
and then had the same days as off
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
.
Surprisingly
, despite the fact that I had
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expected
to enjoy my free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
when I was at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
, I wanted it became over sooner, and when I was at home, I
was upset
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the extra
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
I had. What would have happened if I had had another system for my
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
? I
surely
believe that I could be more energetic and sufficient.

To summarize
, contemplating all remarks, we can
safely
conclude that neither extra free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
nor excessive
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
not influential for a
The character between 'person' and 's' is an accent character, not a standard apostrophe character. Use "person’s" (curly apostrophe) or "person's" (straight apostrophe).
person`s
efficiency.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Three days at home with longer hours of work better than five days at work.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
486 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Three days at home with longer hours of work better than five days at work.