Both the reading and the lecture are about the zoos and the benefit of harm of them for wild animal. While the article proposes three arguments to critic the zoos and enumerate their disadvantage for wild, the lecturer, however, disargues those reasons and asserts that zoos benefit not only wild but also human.
Firstly, the article avers that zoos has very little porfit for endangered animal and it cold not save animal from extinction risk. On the other hand, the professor rebuts this notion by explaining that zoos have ic=ncredeably effect on saving endengered animal. He exemplifies this plus with mentioning that Californis Condor which was in extinction risk and its population has decreased dramatically benefits from this captive breading program. He mentions that after they have reproduced in zoos and they trived and their number increased to 330 individuals they released to wild. They could not surrvive without help of this program, the professor says.
Secondly, the author claims that zoos don't provide enough space for animals. Hence, they do not behave like natural behave in the wildlife. Conversely, the speaker challenges this point by saying that modern zoos apply new natural habitat philosophy which means they provide a large space for them to feel living like natural. He mentions a novel zoo in north Calrolina which has a three hundred acres for animal. With this strategy animal feel comfortable and zookepper can keep them safeer than ever.
Finally, the passage posits that zoos are not the best way to study animals. Wildlife biologists belive that animal should be obserevd in the wild habitat where humans will not interfer with their natural life. Controversially, the lecturer repudiates this idea by explaining that seeing live animal is something that is worth more than reading books. He adds seeing a silver-back lizard in zoos is so wonderful. Seeing wild animal in a good protection life is awesome. He dds that there are thousands biology book but they are not equal to seeing them. Inthe end he believes that zoos have obvioius benefits for wild animal.
Both the reading and the lecture are about the zoos and the
benefit
of harm of them for wild
animal
. While the article proposes three arguments to critic the zoos and enumerate their disadvantage for wild, the lecturer,
however
,
disargues
those reasons and asserts that zoos
benefit
not
only
wild
but
also
human.
Firstly
, the article avers that zoos has
very
little
porfit
for endangered
animal
and it
cold
not save
animal
from extinction
risk
.
On the other hand
, the professor rebuts this notion by explaining that zoos have
ic
=
ncredeably
effect on saving
endengered
animal
. He exemplifies this plus with mentioning that
Californis
Condor which was in extinction
risk
and its population has decreased
dramatically
benefits
from this captive breading program. He mentions that after they have reproduced in
zoos and
they
trived
and their number increased to 330 individuals they released to wild. They could not
surrvive
without
help
of this program, the professor says.
Secondly
, the author claims that zoos don't provide
enough
space for
animals
.
Hence
, they do not behave like
natural
behave in the wildlife.
Conversely
, the speaker challenges this point by saying that modern zoos apply new
natural
habitat philosophy which means they provide a large space for them to feel living like
natural
. He mentions a novel zoo in north
Calrolina
which has a three hundred acres for
animal
. With this strategy
animal
feel comfortable and
zookepper
can
keep
them
safeer
than ever.
Finally
, the passage posits that zoos are not the best way to study
animals
. Wildlife biologists
belive
that
animal
should be
obserevd
in the wild habitat where humans will not
interfer
with their
natural
life.
Controversially
, the lecturer repudiates this
idea
by explaining that seeing
live
animal
is something
that is
worth more than reading books. He
adds
seeing a silver-back lizard in zoos is
so
wonderful. Seeing wild
animal
in a
good
protection life is awesome. He dds that there are thousands biology book
but
they are not equal to seeing them.
Inthe
end
he believes that zoos have
obvioius
benefits
for wild
animal
.