Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

This thesis proposes the hypothesis that there are proteins present in the peritoneal dialysis effluent that will inform on the rate of simple peritoneal sclerosis and EPS.

This thesis proposes the hypothesis that there are proteins present in the peritoneal dialysis effluent that will inform on the rate of simple peritoneal sclerosis and EPS. These proteins are likely to be those involved in tissue remodeling or fibrosis. MMPs, TIMPs, and proteins identified by proteomics are examples on these potential proteins. To address this, each chapter sought to parts of this wider hypothesis. Chapter 3 proposed that changes in the MMP system in the peritoneum would underlie PS &/or the switch to EPS and may 244 have value as biomarkers or diagnostics in PDE while chapter 4 tested the hypothesis that MMP family members had a peritoneal production. Chapter 6 took this information and proposed that changes in the peritoneal cell population would change with time on PD and that this underpinned changes in ECM processing systems with time on PD. Finally, using data from parallel proteomic interrogation of PDE being performed in the same laboratory, chapter 5 attempted to validate some of these data by classical ELISA in the patient cohorts available. The above chapters are important to identify markers of peritoneal injury (biomarkers) that could be monitored to provide indication of the development of peritoneal injury including PS and EPS. Biomarkers that can be measured in the PDE samples can potentially be used to monitor changes occurring in the peritoneal ECM in response to time on treatment. Therefore, the overall aims of this thesis were to identify biomarkers or diagnostic tools for PS and EPS.
This thesis proposes the hypothesis that there are proteins present in the peritoneal dialysis effluent that will inform on the rate of simple peritoneal sclerosis and EPS. These proteins are likely to be those involved in tissue remodeling or fibrosis. MMPs, TIMPs, and proteins identified by proteomics are examples on these potential proteins. To address this, each
chapter
sought to parts of this wider hypothesis.
Chapter
3 proposed that
changes
in the MMP system in the peritoneum would underlie PS &/or the switch to EPS and may

244

have value as biomarkers or diagnostics in PDE while
chapter
4
tested
the hypothesis that MMP family members had a peritoneal production.
Chapter
6 took this information and proposed that
changes
in the peritoneal cell population would
change
with time on PD and that this underpinned
changes
in ECM processing systems with time on PD.
Finally
, using data from parallel proteomic interrogation of PDE
being performed
in the same laboratory,
chapter
5 attempted to validate
some
of these data by classical ELISA in the patient cohorts available. The above
chapters
are
important
to identify markers of peritoneal injury (biomarkers) that could
be monitored
to provide indication of the development of peritoneal injury including PS and EPS. Biomarkers that can
be measured
in the PDE samples can
potentially
be
used
to monitor
changes
occurring in the peritoneal ECM in response to time on treatment.
Therefore
, the
overall
aims of this thesis were to identify biomarkers or diagnostic tools for PS and EPS.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay This thesis proposes the hypothesis that there are proteins present in the peritoneal dialysis effluent that will inform on the rate of simple peritoneal sclerosis and EPS.

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
249 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts