We rely on certain sources of news, brought to us in newspapers, on television or radio and online, for accurate information about world events. Much of this news seems to be bad news. Would it not be better for everyone if less bad news were reported?
Unfortunately, there is still no shortage of bad news in the world today and it is often said that bad news sells, whereas good news does not. The media is made up, predominantly, of commercial organizations which all need to make a profit. It is no surprise therefore that they should publish the kind of news which sells best. To expect commercial organizations to act against their own financial interests would be naive. In addition, how many of us would be happy to learn that some piece of bad news had been held back from us? In such a case, we would surely complain that important information had not been passed on. The abundance of bad news in the world, and correspondingly in the press, does not mean however that there is no place for good news.
To paint an accurate picture of what is happening in the world must surely involve the inclusion of some good news, and we can see in the quality press that good news, as well as bad, is indeed reported. This good news provides reassurance for us and encourages us to keep striving for a better world. It is of course good to hear good news but it does not have the same urgency as bad news. Bad news may affect the stability of our lives. It often has a greater impact on our lives. Accordingly, it can be argued that bad news should take priority over good news.
While it may seem at first glance that there is far too much bad news reported in the press, on closer consideration this imbalance is probably both unsurprising and necessary for the survival of the media, and for our own survival. We cannot therefore conclude that there is too much bad news reported.
We rely on certain sources of
news
, brought to us in newspapers, on television or radio and online, for accurate information about
world
events
. Much of this
news
seems to be
bad
news
. Would it not be better for everyone if less
bad
news
were reported
?
Unfortunately, there is
still
no shortage of
bad
news
in the
world
today
and it is
often
said that
bad
news
sells, whereas
good
news
does not. The media
is
made up,
predominantly
, of commercial organizations which all need to
make
a profit. It is no surprise
therefore
that they should publish the kind of
news
which sells best. To
expect
commercial organizations to act against their
own
financial interests would be naive.
In addition
, how
many
of us would be happy to learn that
some
piece of
bad
news
had
been held
back from us? In such a case, we would
surely
complain that
important
information had not
been passed
on. The abundance of
bad
news
in the
world
, and
correspondingly
in the press, does not mean
however
that there is no place for
good
news.
To paint an accurate picture of what is happening in the
world
must
surely
involve the inclusion of
some
good
news
, and we can
see
in the quality press that
good
news
,
as well
as
bad
, is
indeed
reported. This
good
news
provides reassurance for us and encourages us to
keep
striving for a better
world
. It is
of course
good
to hear
good
news
but
it does not have the same urgency as
bad
news
.
Bad
news
may affect the stability of our
lives
. It
often
has a greater impact on our
lives
.
Accordingly
, it can
be argued
that
bad
news
should take priority over
good
news.
While it may seem at
first
glance that there is far too much
bad
news
reported in the press, on closer consideration this imbalance is
probably
both unsurprising and necessary for the survival of the media, and for our
own
survival. We cannot
therefore
conclude that there is too much
bad
news
reported.