In the past, art was something that could only be experienced in person. However, with the advent of the television, the latest permutations of which have been equipped with internet connectivity, art forms of all types from drama to music have become accessible to the masses in the comfort of their own home. Some people even propose that watching a performance on the TV screen is better and thus there is no point in seeing it live. While I understand the logic behind this sentiment, I believe a comparison between these two starkly different experience is irrelevant. On the one hand, watching a performance on TV makes more sense for the general audience. First, it is considerably cheaper than paying to see it live: watching a concert on pay-per-view, for example, is clearly more affordable than ticket concert, and streaming services like Hulu or Neflix give subscribers access to a vast library of taped live performances for a trifling fee. Second, TV audiences are guaranteed an unobstructed view of the performance. This is usually not the case with the live shows, the economics of which dictates that the average attendee is put in a spot with limited visibility while the seats that enable one to see the artists in their entirety are prohibitively costly. On the other hand, these benefits do not make watching a performance on TV preferable to seeing it in real life. For one, despite the exhaustive repository of videos available online and on TV, many artists productions, especially niched formats like musicals or magic shows, are simply unavailable. And for people who enjoy these particular forms of art, there is really no choice but to pay to go see a show. Another reason why devout live show goers might prefer seeing their favorite artist live is the interaction: the ability to shake hands with the person they have long admired from afar, teh collective cheering with fellow fans for the performers. this spontaneous human contact makes a live show electrifying in a way that TV watching frankly cannot really compare. In conclusion, it technically not necessary to attend a concet or play to enjoy it, but for the enthusiasts who appreciate art and value the experience of witnessing it firsthand, TV is a measly substitute, let alone better.
In the past,
art
was something that could
only
be experienced
in person.
However
, with the advent of the television, the latest permutations of which have
been equipped
with internet connectivity,
art
forms of all types from drama to music have become accessible to the masses in the comfort of their
own
home.
Some
people
even propose that watching a
performance
on the TV screen is better and
thus
there is no point in seeing it
live
. While I understand the logic behind this sentiment, I believe a comparison between these two
starkly
different
experience is irrelevant. On the one hand, watching a
performance
on TV
makes
more sense for the general audience.
First
, it is
considerably
cheaper than paying to
see
it
live
: watching a concert on pay-per-view,
for example
, is
clearly
more affordable than ticket concert, and streaming services like Hulu or
Neflix
give subscribers access to a vast library of taped
live
performances
for a trifling fee. Second, TV audiences
are guaranteed
an unobstructed view of the
performance
. This is
usually
not the case with the
live
shows
, the economics of which dictates that the average attendee
is put
in a spot with limited visibility while the seats that enable one to
see
the artists in their entirety are
prohibitively
costly.
On the other hand
, these benefits do not
make
watching a
performance
on TV preferable to seeing it in real life. For one, despite the exhaustive repository of videos available online and on TV,
many
artists productions,
especially
niched
formats like musicals or magic
shows
, are
simply
unavailable. And for
people
who enjoy these particular forms of
art
, there is
really
no choice
but
to pay to go
see
a
show
. Another reason why devout
live
show
goers might prefer seeing their favorite artist
live
is the interaction: the ability to shake hands with the person they have long admired from afar,
teh
collective cheering with fellow fans for the performers.
this
spontaneous human contact
makes
a
live
show
electrifying in a way that TV watching
frankly
cannot
really
compare.
In conclusion
, it
technically
not necessary to attend a
concet
or play to enjoy it,
but
for the enthusiasts who appreciate
art
and value the experience of witnessing it firsthand, TV is a measly substitute,
let
alone better.