A significant number of people make other countries their new home and this trend is getting popularity each passing day. In my opinion, there should be very scant restrictions to stop travelers from visiting a new continent and choosing a second place to live. There are some pros and cons of this which are discussed in the essay.
On the positive side, there are many countries in the world which do not have sufficient manpower, however they have ample resources to grow. Furthermore, a large population of the world is unemployed in poor countries due to lack of natural resources and other sources of income. Both of the situations/ issues can be resolved entirely by allowing people to move from one place to the other. Therefore, the travelling restriction should be considered in such a way that it attracts the immigrants and rewards them for hard work also, for example by offering permanent residency or citizenship. Additionally, folks who come from the other parts contribute to the economy by paying taxes, college/university fees and this money helps in the development of the country.
On the negative side, easing the rules to settle into any country will increase the fraud and crime rate. There are a number of cases in history when people took loans from banks and ran away from the country. Therefore, the government should check the person's criminal record before issuing the visa which will reduce such kinds of corruption. Additionally, allowing more immigrant than required will put an extra pressure on native people because they will get more competition for jobs and it will increase the unemployment rate too.
In conclusion, I would say there should be freedom to live anywhere in the world so humans and nations can be benefited by each other. In contrast, there should be a complete background check before allowing a person to live in their country.
A significant number of
people
make
other
countries
their new home and this trend is getting popularity each passing day. In my opinion, there should be
very
scant
restrictions to
stop
travelers from visiting a new continent and choosing a second place to
live
. There are
some
pros and cons of this
which
are discussed
in the essay.
On the
positive
side, there are
many
countries
in the world which do not have sufficient manpower,
however
they have ample resources to grow.
Furthermore
, a large population of the world
is unemployed
in poor
countries
due to lack of natural resources and
other
sources of income. Both of the situations/ issues can
be resolved
entirely
by allowing
people
to
move
from one place to the
other
.
Therefore
, the travelling restriction should
be considered
in such a way that it attracts the immigrants and rewards them for
hard
work
also
,
for example
by offering permanent residency or citizenship.
Additionally
, folks who
come
from the
other
parts contribute to the economy by paying taxes, college/university fees and this money
helps
in the development of the country.
On the
negative
side, easing the
rules
to settle into any
country
will increase the fraud and crime rate. There are a number of cases in history when
people
took loans from banks and ran away from the
country
.
Therefore
, the
government
should
check
the person's criminal record
before
issuing the visa which will
reduce
such kinds of corruption.
Additionally
, allowing more immigrant than required will put an extra pressure on native
people
because
they will
get
more competition for jobs and it will increase the unemployment rate too.
In conclusion
, I would say there should be freedom to
live
anywhere in the world
so
humans and nations can
be benefited
by each
other
.
In contrast
, there should be a complete background
check
before
allowing a person to
live
in their
country
.