It is undeniable that a country's wealth depends on its infrastructure. Some people claim that a poor infrastructure of the underdeveloped country is the sole reason to deter its development; hence, foreign aid should be used for better infrastructure. I partially disagree with this notion. I do not consider that enhancing infrastructure is the waste of money, but other major issues are also should be taken into account.
First and foremost, developing countries require foreign investments to increase their growth. So, they should display their infrastructure wealth to gain business deals from foreign industries. In the era of globalisation, foreign investors are eager to start multi-national businesses, but it demands proper infrastructure. To illustrate, investors in many countries were not interested in building their company in Saudi Arabia until they improved their country's infrastructure. Thus, it is important to use foreign aid for infrastructure development.
However, underdeveloped countries should concentrate first on their fundamental need, such as medical and food production. Firstly, the regime should provide no-cost medical treatment to decrease the death rate of the people. Besides this, increase agriculture funding is one of the primary necessities to overcome a lack of food production in a nation. For instance, according to a recent survey of the Times magazine, several underdeveloped countries, mainly focusing on their basic requirements rather than other issues. Therefore, the bureaucracy should fundamentally strong to handle minor problems.
To conclude, although it is essential to improve the country's infrastructure, major issues should be considered primarily. The regime should fulfil the basic needs of the citizens before focusing on other improvements. I believe that, in the future, underdeveloped nation's will focus on people's fundamental needs.
It is undeniable that a country's wealth depends on its
infrastructure
.
Some
people
claim that a poor
infrastructure
of the
underdeveloped
country
is the sole reason to deter its development;
hence
,
foreign
aid should be
used
for better
infrastructure
. I
partially
disagree with this notion. I do not consider that enhancing
infrastructure
is the waste of money,
but
other major issues are
also
should
be taken
into account.
First
and foremost, developing
countries
require
foreign
investments to increase their growth.
So
, they should display their
infrastructure
wealth to gain business deals from
foreign
industries. In the era of
globalisation
,
foreign
investors are eager to
start
multi-national businesses,
but
it demands proper
infrastructure
. To illustrate, investors in
many
countries
were not interested in building their
company
in Saudi Arabia until they
improved
their country's
infrastructure
.
Thus
, it is
important
to
use
foreign
aid for
infrastructure
development.
However
,
underdeveloped
countries
should concentrate
first
on their fundamental need, such as medical and food production.
Firstly
, the regime should provide no-cost medical treatment to decrease the death rate of the
people
.
Besides
this, increase agriculture funding is one of the primary necessities to overcome a lack of food production in a nation.
For instance
, according to a recent survey of the Times magazine, several
underdeveloped
countries
,
mainly
focusing on their basic requirements
rather
than other issues.
Therefore
, the bureaucracy should
fundamentally
strong to handle minor problems.
To conclude
, although it is essential to
improve
the country's
infrastructure
, major issues should
be considered
primarily
. The regime should fulfil the basic needs of the citizens
before
focusing on other improvements. I believe that, in the future,
underdeveloped
nation's will focus on
people
's fundamental needs.