It is true the use of cell phones has gained in popularity over the past few
decades, making a paradigm shift in the lifestyle of every human on Earth.
Although some might suggest banning mobile phones like cigarettes due to
their presumably antisocial effects, the suggestion is groundless and should
not be implemented.
There are a number of reasons why mobile phones are not as antisocial as
smoking. First, people, rather than mobile phones, are the factor that
ultimately decide whether or not to engage in antisocial behaviors. In fact,
there are plenty of mobile phone users who are even more prosocial than
non-users, suggesting an insignificant causal relationship between mobile
phones and antisocial behaviors. Second, mobile phones should not be
compared to smoking as they are two distinct products. While cigarettes use
chemical compounds to directly influence smokers’ brain, mobile phones
have nothing to do with these chemicals.
Another compelling reason to not ban mobile phones is that they are
necessary to daily life. First, using mobile phones is one of the most efficient
and inexpensive ways to communicate with others. Before the appearance
of mobile phones, delivering a message from one location to another would
require physical travels, costing unnecessary time, effort and money. In
addition, mobile phones have functions that enable users to keep contacts,
thereby promoting social behaviors and strengthening social connections.
For example, people are more likely to lose important contacts and might
even forget one another if they do not use mobile phones.
In conclusion, since mobile phones have nothing to do with antisocial effects
and smoking, they should not be banned. If any, the net advantage of using
mobile phones is still too high to consider banning.
It is true the
use
of cell
phones
has gained in popularity over the past few
decades, making a paradigm shift in the lifestyle of every human on Earth.
Although
some
might suggest banning mobile
phones
like cigarettes due to
their presumably
antisocial
effects, the suggestion is groundless and should
not
be implemented
.
There are a number of reasons why mobile
phones
are not as
antisocial
as
smoking.
First
,
people
,
rather
than mobile
phones
, are the factor that
ultimately
decide
whether or not
to engage in
antisocial
behaviors. In fact,
there are
plenty
of mobile
phone
users who are even more prosocial than
non-users, suggesting an insignificant causal relationship between mobile
phones and
antisocial
behaviors. Second, mobile
phones
should not
be
compared
to smoking as they are two distinct products. While cigarettes
use
chemical compounds to
directly
influence smokers’ brain, mobile phones
have nothing to do with these chemicals.
Another compelling reason to not ban mobile
phones
is that they are
necessary to daily life.
First
, using mobile
phones
is one of the most efficient
and inexpensive ways to communicate with others.
Before
the appearance
of mobile
phones
, delivering a message from one location to another would
require physical travels, costing unnecessary time, effort and money. In
addition, mobile
phones
have functions that enable users to
keep
contacts,
thereby promoting social behaviors and strengthening social connections.
For example
,
people
are more likely to lose
important
contacts and might
even forget one another if they do not
use
mobile phones.
In conclusion
, since mobile
phones
have nothing to do with
antisocial
effects
and smoking, they should not
be banned
. If any, the net advantage of using
mobile
phones
is
still
too high to consider banning.