Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The usage of private transport has increased . is the government spend in electric vehicles or in public trasportation.

The usage of private transport has increased. is the government spend in electric vehicles or in public trasportation. werRE
It is generally perceived that the percentage of personal vehicles has been inclining day by day which cause numerous problems such as pollution and global warming. Moreover, the individuals have suggested that the authorities either expend on the betterment of public vehicles, or they invest their money on the electric vehicles. According to my viewpoint, the government should spend on the advancement of public vehicles as it is affordable and less costly. The prime catalyst behind my support to public transportation is affordable, owing the society is divided into upper or lower class; all people do not have their personal transport; that’s why multifarious individuals are still dependent on government vehicles. It is the obligation of authorities to expend on public transport such as railway, buses. Proving ahead, if masses use the vehicles in community then it not only saves their money, but also decreases the level of pollution. A good example of this is the Australian government has put a ban on the use of private vehicles such as cars; this lead to a pragmatic result as 50% of air pollution has reduced in Australia, according to the ‘Pollutant Survey Organization’. Hence, government investment is required in public transportation. Further, reinforcing my idea the authorities must invest their funds on electric vehicles as it assists in the sustainable development for the reason the non renewable resource takes million of years to regenerate such as petroleum; if electric transportation system will use then it neither causes pollution, nor these vehicles need petrol or diesel to work. Also, if government will spend finance then everyone can buy this and live a pollution free life. To epitome, Indian authorities start up a new project of electric scootery due to the rising pollution related ailments such as asthma, according to the BBC report. To conclude, I believe the above mentioned reasons are evident to state that the authorities investment has been required in reducing the pollution; the expenditure is either in the betterment of public transport, or in the adoption of electric vehicles.
It is
generally
perceived that the percentage of personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
has been inclining day by day which cause numerous problems such as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
and global warming.
Moreover
, the individuals have suggested that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authorities
either expend on the betterment of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
, or they invest their money on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
. According to my viewpoint, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
should spend on the advancement of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
as it is affordable and less costly.

The prime catalyst behind my support to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
transportation is affordable, owing the society
is divided
into upper or lower
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
class
; all
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
do not have their personal transport; that’s why multifarious individuals are
still
dependent on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
. It is the obligation of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authorities
to expend on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
transport such as railway, buses. Proving ahead, if masses
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
in community then it not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
saves their money,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
decreases the level of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. A
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
example of this is the Australian
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
has put a ban on the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
such as cars; this lead to a pragmatic result as 50% of air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
has
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
in Australia, according to the ‘Pollutant Survey Organization’.
Hence
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
investment
is required
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
transportation.

Further
, reinforcing my
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authorities
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
invest their funds on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
as it assists in the sustainable development for the reason the
It appears that a hyphen is missing.
non renewable
resource takes
Use "a million" or use a number before 'million'.
million
of years to regenerate such as petroleum; if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electric
transportation system will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
then it neither
Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean "causes'" or "cause's"?
causes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
, nor these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
need petrol or diesel to work.
Also
, if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
will spend finance then everyone can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
buy
this and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
free life. To epitome, Indian
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authorities
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
up a new project of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electric
Possible spelling mistake found.
scootery
due to the rising
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
related ailments such as asthma, according to the BBC report.

To conclude
, I believe the above mentioned reasons are evident to state that the
Apostrophe might be missing. Did you mean "authorities'" or "authority's"?
authorities
investment has
been required
in reducing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
; the expenditure is either in the betterment of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
transport, or in the adoption of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The usage of private transport has increased. is the government spend in electric vehicles or in public trasportation.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
340 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts