In the next decade, people can access online contents such as books, newspaper. I strongly agree with this idea but users of online platforms will pay a small amount for reaching tons of materials.
In my opinion, online materials can be carried easily and they are very portable. We have extremely high memory capacity to store this virtual literature. You can take and carry all books you need to read with a small flash memory. In addition, this kind of newspaper and books don’t have printing costs. Therefore they are very affordable if you compare to physical ones. Also, you don’t need storage areas to hide such as book shelfs or newspaper stands. Because they are quite compact. If you have an e-reading device or some flash memory sticks, storing will not be a problem for readers. and They can use places for living instead of paper storage. Moreover, people can search online materials with softwares and they can reach what they want with only simple key words. This way of searching is far better than manual scanning for information. Thus people will tend to prefer ones instead of printed newspapers and books. One the other hand, this type of resources have editorial, writing expenses. For example, being a writer of a book and producing precious context is pretty important for online platforms. Therefore people have to pay the efforts of writers for eligible content. Otherwise nobody can produce something valuable without paying living outgoings.
In conclusion, I full-heartedly agree with the idea and reaching qualified books and newspapers with virtual ways when you want sounds great. But, people have to give some financial support to producers, writers, editors. And even online platforms have running costs like domain and dns bills. Hence people should pay at least for appreciation of all valuable efforts.
In the
next
decade,
people
can access
online
contents such as
books
,
newspaper
. I
strongly
agree
with this
idea
but
users of
online
platforms will pay a
small
amount for reaching tons of materials.
In my opinion,
online
materials can
be carried
easily and
they are
very
portable. We have
extremely
high memory capacity to store this virtual literature. You can take and carry all
books
you need to read with a
small
flash memory.
In addition
, this kind of
newspaper
and
books
don’t have printing costs.
Therefore
they are
very
affordable if you compare to physical ones.
Also
, you don’t need storage areas to
hide
such as
book
shelfs
or
newspaper
stands.
Because
they are quite compact. If you have an e-reading device or
some
flash memory sticks, storing will not be a problem for readers.
and
They can
use
places for living
instead
of paper storage.
Moreover
,
people
can search
online
materials with
softwares and
they can reach what they want with
only
simple
key words
. This way of searching is far better than manual scanning for information.
Thus
people
will tend to prefer ones
instead
of printed
newspapers
and
books
.
One
the other hand, this type of resources have editorial, writing expenses.
For example
, being a writer of a
book
and producing precious context is pretty
important
for
online
platforms.
Therefore
people
have to
pay the efforts of writers for eligible content.
Otherwise
nobody can produce something valuable without paying living outgoings.
In conclusion
, I full-
heartedly
agree
with the
idea
and reaching qualified
books
and
newspapers
with virtual ways when you want sounds great.
But
,
people
have to
give
some
financial support to producers, writers, editors. And even
online
platforms have running costs like domain and
dns
bills.
Hence
people
should pay at least for appreciation of all valuable efforts.