The material discusses the new stricter rules that the US should adopt for handling and storing coal ash. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
first, the author claims that these standers are already existed. On the other hand, the professor opposes that and says these rules should be updated because the old rule of using liner special material is not sufficient. the lecturer adds that the current regulation use this liner for only new landfills or new ponds, but do not use it in the old disposal sites. The listening mentions that casues leaking of harmful chemical material into ground water and contaminats the drinking water. As a result, these rules should be active in both old and new disposal sites.
Second, the reading posits that these stricter rules could discourage consumers from using coal ash recycle material. On the contrary, the lecturer contradicts this and points that these rules will never affect consuming recyle materials because other old danger materials, such as murcuery use this approach and has continued to recycle for fifty years, and consumers do not have any concers, even though the stricter handle rules.
Third, the author states that these stricter regulations will increase the cost of the power. In contrast, the professor challenges this and says that it is true the cost of power will increase; however, the result is wellworthy. The lecturer explains that the cost of power companies will be fifteen billion dollar, but analyzes that mathematically reveal that houses' electric bill will just increase one percent, which is not a big price to pay for having a clean environment.
The
material
discusses the
new
stricter
rules
that the US should adopt for handling and storing coal ash. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
first
, the author claims that these standers are already existed.
On the other hand
, the professor opposes that and says these
rules
should
be updated
because
the
old
rule
of using liner special
material
is not sufficient.
the
lecturer
adds
that the
current
regulation
use
this liner for
only
new
landfills or
new
ponds,
but
do not
use
it in the
old
disposal sites. The listening mentions that
casues
leaking of harmful chemical
material
into ground water and
contaminats
the drinking water.
As a result
, these
rules
should be active in both
old
and
new
disposal sites.
Second, the reading posits that these
stricter
rules
could discourage consumers from using coal ash recycle
material
.
On the contrary
, the lecturer contradicts this and points that these
rules
will never affect consuming
recyle
materials
because
other
old
danger
materials
, such as
murcuery
use
this approach and has continued to recycle for fifty years, and consumers do not have any
concers
,
even though
the
stricter
handle
rules
.
Third, the author states that these
stricter
regulations will increase the cost of the power.
In contrast
, the professor challenges this and says that it is true the cost of power will increase;
however
, the result is
wellworthy
. The lecturer
explains
that the cost of power
companies
will be fifteen billion
dollar
,
but
analyzes that
mathematically
reveal that
houses
' electric bill will
just
increase one percent, which is not a
big
price to pay for having a clean environment.