The material discusses the drawbacks of online encyclopedias. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely communal online encyclopedias lack accuracy. Next, hackers have chances to make changes and corrupt the content of encyclopedias. Finally, online encyclopedias have a large variety of topics, which could confuse children.
Conversely, the lecture challenges the points one specific contradiction is traditional encyclopedias do not close accuracy; furthermore, if people search for a reference that does not have any errors, they could not find it. Moreover, the errors in the online encyclopedias could be fixed; however, errors in printed encyclopedias remain for decades. In addition to that, hacking on the online encyclopedias could be solved by two strategies, first, people could put crucial factors and format that nobody could dispute. Second, special editors could monitor those changes and limit them. One final point, traditional encyclopedias have limited space, so experts should decide which academic topics could be published; as a result, it could not reflect the great diversity. one the other hand, online encyclopedias do not have this problem, it could have a great variety of topics and could reflect the great diversity of people's desire. Consequently, it is one of the strongest advantages of online encyclopedias.
The material discusses the drawbacks of
online
encyclopedias. While the reading looks at the
topic
from one perspective, the listening challenges certain
points
outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly
, the reading
details
specific
points
regarding this
topic
,
namely
communal
online
encyclopedias lack accuracy.
Next
, hackers have chances to
make
changes
and corrupt the content of encyclopedias.
Finally
,
online
encyclopedias have a large variety of
topics
, which could confuse children.
Conversely
, the lecture challenges the
points
one specific contradiction is traditional encyclopedias do not close accuracy;
furthermore
, if
people
search for a reference that does not have any errors, they could not find it.
Moreover
, the errors in the
online
encyclopedias could be
fixed
;
however
, errors in printed encyclopedias remain for decades.
In addition
to that, hacking on the
online
encyclopedias could
be solved
by two strategies,
first
,
people
could put crucial factors and format that nobody could dispute. Second, special editors could monitor those
changes
and limit them. One final
point
, traditional encyclopedias have limited space,
so
experts should decide which academic
topics
could
be published
;
as a result
, it could not reflect the great diversity.
one
the other hand,
online
encyclopedias do not have this problem, it could have a great variety of
topics
and could reflect the great diversity of
people
's desire.
Consequently
, it is one of the strongest advantages of
online
encyclopedias.