Many governments around the world are running plans to restore old buildings is there
Major cities. However, lots of people think that this money should be used to upgrade and create new infrastructure, like roads or new housing areas. I completely agree with this statement.
Of course, there are certain benefits to renovate old buildings, especially those in major
cities. First of all, if the buildings chosen to be restored carry some significant cultural representation, then I believe we should try to restore as many of them as possible. we need to keep these buildings to educate younger generations of the architecture of older times. Secondly, if the buildings’ inner structures are able to accommodate people, I believe it would be more cost-effective to restore old buildings than to build new ones. This will help the government to save the budget to use for other purposes.
However, there are still reasons why I think that the restoration of old buildings is a waste of money. To developing countries whose budgets are still limited and their infrastructure are still yet to be developed, they should focus more on upgrading roads and building New residential areas. This is because, in these countries, the number of people migrating to major cities in search of jobs is still ever-increasing. Therefore, the top priority of these countries should be to accommodate these people. Furthermore, no matter how one restores a building, it would not be on par with a newly-built one. I believe there is no Point in forcing people to live in a restored building if there is enough economic resources To build a new one.
In conclusion, although I believe that the restoration of old buildings is of cultural
importance to protect the heritage of a country, I think that, especially to developing
Countries, it is more crucial to improve the infrastructure first
Many
governments
around the world are running plans to
restore
old
buildings
is there
Major cities.
However
, lots of
people
think
that this money should be
used
to upgrade and create
new
infrastructure, like roads or
new
housing areas. I completely
agree
with this statement.
Of course
, there are certain benefits to renovate
old
buildings
,
especially
those in major
cities
.
First of all
, if the
buildings
chosen to
be restored
carry
some
significant cultural representation, then I
believe
we should try to
restore
as
many
of them as possible.
we
need to
keep
these
buildings
to educate younger generations of the architecture of older times.
Secondly
, if the
buildings’
inner structures are able to accommodate
people
, I
believe
it would be more cost-effective to
restore
old
buildings
than to build
new
ones. This will
help
the
government
to save the budget to
use
for other purposes.
However
, there are
still
reasons why I
think
that the restoration of
old
buildings
is a waste of money. To developing
countries
whose budgets are
still
limited and their infrastructure are
still
yet
to
be developed
, they should focus more on upgrading roads and
building
New
residential areas. This is
because
, in these
countries
, the number of
people
migrating to major cities in search of jobs is
still
ever-increasing.
Therefore
, the top priority of these
countries
should be to accommodate these
people
.
Furthermore
, no matter how one
restores
a
building
, it would not be on par with a
newly
-built one. I
believe
there is no Point in forcing
people
to
live
in a restored
building
if there is
enough
economic resources To build a
new
one.
In conclusion
, although I
believe
that the restoration of
old
buildings
is of cultural
importance to protect the heritage of a
country
, I
think
that,
especially
to developing
Countries, it is more crucial to
improve
the infrastructure
first