Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The reading passage argues that the “let it burn” policy should be replaced

The reading passage argues that the “let it burn” policy should be replaced DQnk
The reading passage argues that the “let it burn” policy should be replaced by the policy of extinguishing forest fires as soon as they appeared. However, the professor raises serious counterarguments against the reading paragraph by providing three aspects as listed below: First, according to the speaker, the natural forest fires are a cycle of creativity even they have a large scale of damage, and after the fires, new plants which became more diverse than before existed in the Yellowstone. For example, some big plants were replaced by the small ones that appeared in the Yellowstone due to the open and shaded lands. Another example is that it was a better place for certain seeds thanks to the high level of heat. This point directly contradicts what the passage indicates. Second, the reading passage states that the fire was the destruction of habitats and the disruption of the food chain. The professor, however, stated that the population had already recovered, and created some ideal habitats for the small animals such as rabbits and hares. Moreover, since the rabbits and hares began to live there, the predators who lived on them came to live in the Yellowstone, too. Therefore, the certain food chain was stronger than before. This is another point where listening opposes the reading passage. Third, quite different from what had been stated in the reading passage, the lecture said that the fire in 1988 was quite unusual and it did not happen every year. Moreover, the massive fire was caused by the low rainfall and the strong wind, which could not occur again. Besides, the victors still come back to the Yellowstone next year and each year after that. This point refutes the view stated in the reading passage
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
argues that the “
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
let
it burn” policy should
be replaced
by the policy of extinguishing forest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fires
as
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
soon
as they appeared.
However
, the professor raises serious counterarguments against the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
paragraph by providing three aspects as listed below:
First
, according to the speaker, the natural forest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fires
are a cycle of creativity even they have a large scale of damage, and after the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fires
, new plants which became more diverse than
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
existed in the Yellowstone.
For example
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
plants
were replaced
by the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
ones that appeared in the Yellowstone due to the open and shaded lands. Another example is that it was a better place for certain seeds thanks to the high level of heat. This point
directly
contradicts what the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
indicates. Second, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
states that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
was the destruction of habitats and the disruption of the food chain. The professor,
however
, stated that the population had already recovered, and created
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
ideal habitats for the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
animals such as rabbits and hares.
Moreover
, since the rabbits and hares began to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
there, the predators who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lived
on them came to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
in the Yellowstone, too.
Therefore
, the certain food chain was stronger than
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
. This is another point where listening opposes the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
. Third, quite
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
from what had
been stated
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
, the lecture said that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
in 1988 was quite unusual and it did not happen every year.
Moreover
, the massive
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
was caused
by the low rainfall and the strong wind, which could not occur again.
Besides
, the victors
still
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
come
back to the Yellowstone
next
year and each year after that. This point refutes the view stated in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
passage
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The reading passage argues that the “let it burn” policy should be replaced

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
290 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The reading passage argues that the “let it burn” policy should be replaced