The reading claims that now a day, the rare and important fossils are being sold to private ownership and its huge lose to science and private public. It provides three reasons for support. However, the professor refutes that point by saying that the benefits of selling of fossils out ways its negative impacts. She opposes each reasons mention in the passage.
First, the reading describes that public do not get chance to see the fossils as, the private owner do not allow public viewer. On the other hand, the professor explains that the public get greater exposer as commercial people sell fossils at very low price, so any school and library can afford it. They can display this fossil open to the public, so people get great exposure to it.
Second, the author mentions that scientist more likely to lose access to some of the important fossils and miss potential discovery about extinct life form. In contrast, the lecture claims that its not realistic point. Commercial people only can put value on any fossils, if scientist and experts identify it as valuable fossil. Scientist has to run enough tests and examination to approve it. Scientist get all scientific details related to the fossil first, therefore there is no chance to miss some important detains related to extinct life form.
Third, the article describes that commercial collector often destroy valuable scientific evidence associated with the fossils they unearth. The lecture claims that they do some damage while collecting fossils and they lose some data related to fossil’s position in the earth, but it’s more likely to get undiscovered fossils. Schools and universities do not run enough operation to discover fossils. Therefor it is better to get discovered fossils, rather than nothing.
Thus, the reading and the lecture counteract each other about the benefits of fossil selling to the commercial persons.
The reading claims that
now
a day, the rare and
important
fossils
are
being sold
to private ownership and its huge lose to science and private
public
. It provides three reasons for support.
However
, the professor refutes that point by saying that the benefits of selling of
fossils
out ways its
negative
impacts. She opposes each reasons mention in the passage.
First
, the reading
describes
that
public
do not
get
chance to
see
the
fossils
as, the private owner do not
allow
public
viewer.
On the other hand
, the professor
explains
that the
public
get
greater
exposer
as
commercial
people
sell
fossils
at
very
low price,
so
any school and library can afford it. They can display this
fossil
open to the
public
,
so
people
get
great exposure to it.
Second, the author mentions that
scientist
more likely to lose access to
some of the
important
fossils
and miss potential discovery about extinct life form.
In contrast
, the lecture claims that its not realistic point.
Commercial
people
only
can put value on any
fossils
, if
scientist
and experts identify it as valuable
fossil
.
Scientist
has to
run
enough
tests
and examination to approve it.
Scientist
get
all scientific
details
related to the
fossil
first
,
therefore
there is no chance to miss
some
important
detains related to extinct life form.
Third, the article
describes
that
commercial
collector
often
destroy
valuable scientific evidence associated with the
fossils
they unearth. The lecture claims that they do
some
damage while collecting
fossils and
they lose
some
data related to
fossil’s
position in the earth,
but
it’s more likely to
get
undiscovered
fossils
. Schools and universities do not run
enough
operation to discover
fossils
. Therefor it is better to
get
discovered
fossils
,
rather
than nothing.
Thus
, the reading and the lecture counteract each other about the benefits of
fossil
selling to the
commercial
persons.