Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The reading and the lecture are both about birds.

The reading and the lecture are both about birds. aEK5G

The reading and the lecture are both about birds. The author of the reading presents three theories about why the bird population is decreasing. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the reading. His position is that now the bird population is increasing. According to the reading, homes, malls, and offices are being built by destroying the bird's natural habitat such as forests, wetlands and grasslands. Thus, the bird population is declining by not getting the proper habitat. The specific argument is challenged by the author. He claims that there are many types of bird, which prefer buildings as a habitat than trees. Therefore, the bird population is increasing instead of reducing. Secondly, the author suggests that birds' habitats are now converting into agricultural lands for meeting the increasing population's food demands. The lecturer, however, asserts that compared to past, now fewer lands are being used for the agricultural purpose. He goes on to say that modern science has increased the productivity of lands. So, fewer lands are producing more crops. Finally, the lecturer posits that now pesticides are less toxic than the past. Additionally, scientists have invented new crops which are pest restricted. As a result, no birds are now facing harm due to pesticides like before. This directly contradicts what the reading indicates.

The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaccountknowledgelessonstudyversionexamination
reading
 and the lecture are both about You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
birds
. The author of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaccountknowledgelessonstudyversionexamination
reading
 presents three theories about why the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
bird
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsocietypopulacepeoplecommunityculturestate
population
 is decreasing. Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
The
 lecturer disputes the claims made in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaccountknowledgelessonstudyversionexamination
reading
. His position is that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtoday
now
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
bird
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsocietypopulacepeoplecommunityculturestate
population
 is increasing.

According to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaccountknowledgelessonstudyversionexamination
reading
, homes, malls, and offices are being built
 by destroying the bird's natural You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdwellingnestcaveterrainenvironmentsurroundings
habitat
 such as forests, wetlands and grasslands. Thus
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
bird
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsocietypopulacepeoplecommunityculturestate
population
 is declining by not getting the proper You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdwellingnestcaveterrainenvironmentsurroundings
habitat
. The specific argument is challenged
 by the author. He claims that there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 types of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
bird
, which prefer buildings as a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdwellingnestcaveterrainenvironmentsurroundings
habitat
 than trees. Therefore
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
bird
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsocietypopulacepeoplecommunityculturestate
population
 is increasing instead
 of reducing.

Secondly
, the author suggests that birds' habitats are You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtoday
now
 converting into agricultural You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
lands
 for meeting the increasing population's food demands. The lecturer, however
, asserts that compared to past, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtoday
now
 fewer You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
lands
 are being This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 for the agricultural purpose. He goes on to say that modern science has increased the productivity of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
lands
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
, fewer You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
lands
 are producing more crops.

Finally
, the lecturer posits that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtoday
now
 pesticides are less toxic than the past. Additionally
, scientists have invented new crops which are pest restricted. As a result
, no You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
birds
 are You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtoday
now
 facing harm due to pesticides like This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
. This directly
 contradicts what the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaccountknowledgelessonstudyversionexamination
reading
 indicates. 