The reading and the lectur are both about Chevalier memoir. While as the auther postis that some critics have raised doubt about the accuracy of his memoir, then he gives three claims to supports his point. The lectureer, however, belivies that his memori is brity accurate and realible by casting doubts on each reason.
To start with, the passage calims that the Chevalier was poor based on the evidence that show he borrowed money from Swiss merchant. However, the lecturer refutes this claim by saying that when he needed money for his gambling, he was borrowing money until the selling process of his assets compleated.
Secondly, according to the author, the conversations with Voltaire could not be accurate, because it were written many years after. On the contrary, the lecturer explains how he was writting daily journals and he was using them for the memori.
Finally, the reading contendes that Chevar jailers were bribes to free him. On the the other hand the professor challenge this point by explaining who his richer friends stayed at jail. Moreover, the jail had to fix his room celing. This concider prove that he escape from it.
The reading and the
lectur
are both about Chevalier memoir. While as the
auther
postis
that
some
critics have raised doubt about the accuracy of his memoir, then he gives three claims to
supports
his point. The
lectureer
,
however
,
belivies
that his
memori
is
brity
accurate and
realible
by casting doubts on each reason.
To
start
with, the passage
calims
that the Chevalier was poor based on the evidence that
show
he borrowed money from Swiss merchant.
However
, the lecturer refutes this claim by saying that when he needed money for his gambling, he was borrowing money until the selling process of his assets
compleated
.
Secondly
, according to the author, the conversations with Voltaire could not be accurate,
because
it
were written
many
years after.
On the contrary
, the lecturer
explains
how he was
writting
daily
journals and
he was using them for the
memori
.
Finally
, the reading
contendes
that
Chevar
jailers were bribes to free him. On
the the
other hand the professor challenge this point by explaining who his richer friends stayed at jail.
Moreover
, the jail had to
fix
his room
celing
. This
concider
prove that he escape from it.