The reading and lecture both about colonization notion of asteroids. The author of the reading feels that in our galaxy thousand of asteroids and easy to colonization there for several reasons. The lecturer challenged the claim made by the author. He is on the opinion that the presenting claims are not practical and has a serious downside.
To begin with, the author argues that it has less gravity and easy to land of the ground. He also claims that less gravity allows the spacecraft to transfer more instrument and requires less fuel. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer, He mentions that low gravity has a negative impact on the body. He also states that astronomer experienced muscle mask and bone stretch after spending several days on the spacecraft. Moreover, muscle and bones lose their density.
Second, the writer suggests that asteroids are full of valuable metals like gold, platinum which is a profitable source of earning. He also adds that from this business the project can easily sponsor. However, the lecturer rebuts this by mentioning that minerals are the profitable business but it is not the whole picture. He claims that the transportation rate is high and when the precious material will available to the market the consumer will be less interested and the market price will low.
Third, the author posits that asteroids come constantly near to the earth and require less time to transfer. He also mentions that it will be affordable and also cost-effective. In contrast, the lecturer position is that it is true that they orbit near to the earth but also pass the earth far distance. He also noted that when it departed the earth for a long time it will be challenging for the spacecraft to reach on earth.
The reading and lecture both about colonization notion of
asteroids
. The
author
of the reading feels that in our galaxy
thousand
of
asteroids
and easy to colonization there for several reasons.
The
lecturer
challenged the
claim
made by the
author
. He is on the opinion that the presenting
claims
are not practical and has a serious downside.
To
begin
with, the
author
argues that it has
less
gravity and easy to land of the ground. He
also
claims
that
less
gravity
allows
the spacecraft to transfer more instrument and requires
less
fuel. The specific argument
is challenged
by the
lecturer
, He mentions that low gravity has a
negative
impact on the body. He
also
states that astronomer experienced muscle mask and bone stretch after spending several days on the spacecraft.
Moreover
, muscle and bones lose their density.
Second, the writer suggests that
asteroids
are full of valuable metals like gold, platinum which is a profitable source of earning. He
also
adds
that from this business the project can
easily
sponsor.
However
, the
lecturer
rebuts this by mentioning that minerals are the profitable business
but
it is not the whole picture. He
claims
that the transportation rate is high and when the precious material will available to the market the consumer will be
less
interested and the market price will
low
.
Third, the
author
posits that
asteroids
come
constantly
near to the
earth
and require
less
time to transfer. He
also
mentions that it will be affordable and
also
cost-effective.
In contrast
, the
lecturer
position is that it is true that they orbit near to the
earth
but
also
pass the
earth
far distance. He
also
noted that when it departed the
earth
for a long time it will be challenging for the spacecraft to reach on
earth
.