The passage talks against the commercial trade of the fossils to private owners, and the lecturer totally disagrees with that and thinks that benefits of the commercial trade of the fossils outweigh the disadvantages.
Firstly, the article describes, how private trade of fossils instead of donating in the museums, reduces the interest in general public regarding the fossils. However, the lecturer argues that commercial fossils trades enhances their purchases by public schools and libraries, which indeed make it more accessible to the general public.
Secondly, the passage asserts that, the commercial trade make it harder for scientists to know about the facts regarding extinction of the live forms of the fossils. However, the lecturer refutes the argument. According to him, it is unrealistic to believe scientific disadvantage of commercial trade because, scientist always required to value and identification of the fossil before it's trade. Trade of the fossil is only possible after detailed examination and identification by a scientific professional.
Moreover, the article gives an explanation how the commercial fossil collectors destroy the valuable scientific evidences by destroying their positions and immediate surroundings. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that, without those discoveries by commercial collectors, it could not be possible to know about some extinct species. Additionally, collectors made it possible to discover the fossils. Therefore, it is better to have an idea about of those fossils regardless of the minute details like position and situation.
The passage talks against the
commercial
trade
of the
fossils
to private owners, and the
lecturer
totally
disagrees with that and
thinks
that benefits of the
commercial
trade
of the
fossils
outweigh the disadvantages.
Firstly
, the article
describes
, how private
trade
of
fossils
instead
of donating in the museums,
reduces
the interest in
general public
regarding the
fossils
.
However
, the
lecturer
argues that
commercial
fossils
trades
enhances their
purchases
by public schools and libraries, which
indeed
make
it more accessible to the
general public
.
Secondly
, the passage asserts that, the
commercial
trade
make
it harder for scientists to know about the facts regarding extinction of the
live
forms of the
fossils
.
However
, the
lecturer
refutes the argument. According to him, it is unrealistic to believe scientific disadvantage of
commercial
trade
because
, scientist always required to value and identification of the
fossil
before
it's
trade
.
Trade
of the
fossil
is
only
possible after detailed examination and identification by a scientific professional.
Moreover
, the article gives an explanation how the
commercial
fossil
collectors
destroy
the valuable scientific evidences by destroying their positions and immediate surroundings.
On the other hand
, the
lecturer
argues that, without those discoveries by
commercial
collectors, it could not be possible to know about
some
extinct species.
Additionally
, collectors made it possible to discover the
fossils
.
Therefore
, it is better to have an
idea
about of those
fossils
regardless of the minute
details
like position and situation.